Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-32591: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Kevon Adonis WP Abstracts

0
Unknown
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-32591cvecve-2025-32591
Published: Wed Apr 09 2025 (04/09/2025, 16:09:30 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: Kevon Adonis
Product: WP Abstracts

Description

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kevon Adonis WP Abstracts wp-abstracts-manuscripts-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Abstracts: from n/a through <= 2.7.5.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 04/02/2026, 03:31:39 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-32591 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Abstracts plugin developed by Kevon Adonis, specifically affecting the wp-abstracts-manuscripts-manager component in versions up to and including 2.7.5. CSRF vulnerabilities occur when an attacker tricks an authenticated user into submitting a forged request to a web application without their knowledge, exploiting the user's active session and privileges. In this case, the vulnerability allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of legitimate users by sending crafted requests that the server processes as valid. The WP Abstracts plugin is used primarily for managing abstracts and manuscripts, often in academic or conference settings, making it a critical tool for event organizers and researchers. The lack of CSRF protection means that attackers can potentially manipulate submissions, modify abstracts, or disrupt the management workflow. Although no public exploits have been reported yet, the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and could be targeted by attackers. The absence of a CVSS score indicates that the severity assessment must consider the potential impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, the ease of exploitation (no user interaction beyond visiting a malicious site), and the scope of affected systems (all installations using vulnerable versions). The vulnerability does not require authentication bypass but leverages the victim's authenticated session, increasing the risk for logged-in users with sufficient privileges. The technical details do not provide patch links, indicating that users should monitor vendor updates or apply manual mitigations.

Potential Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2025-32591 is on the integrity and availability of affected WordPress sites using the WP Abstracts plugin. Attackers exploiting this CSRF vulnerability can perform unauthorized actions such as modifying, deleting, or submitting abstracts and manuscripts without the user's consent. This can lead to data corruption, loss of trust in the platform, and disruption of academic or conference workflows. Organizations relying on WP Abstracts for managing submissions may face reputational damage and operational delays. Since the vulnerability exploits authenticated sessions, users with elevated privileges (e.g., administrators or editors) are at higher risk, potentially allowing attackers to escalate the impact. The lack of known exploits in the wild currently limits immediate widespread damage, but the public disclosure increases the likelihood of future attacks. The vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality but can indirectly affect it if attackers manipulate content or gain further access through chained attacks. Overall, the threat poses a significant risk to organizations managing sensitive or critical submission data via WP Abstracts.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2025-32591, organizations should first check for and apply any official patches or updates released by Kevon Adonis for the WP Abstracts plugin. If no patch is available, administrators should implement manual CSRF protections by adding anti-CSRF tokens to all state-changing requests within the wp-abstracts-manuscripts-manager component. Additionally, verifying the HTTP Referer header or implementing same-site cookies can help reduce CSRF risks. Limiting user privileges to the minimum necessary reduces the potential impact if an account is compromised. Monitoring web server logs for unusual POST requests or suspicious referrers can help detect exploitation attempts. Educating users about the risks of clicking on untrusted links while logged into the WordPress admin panel is also beneficial. Finally, consider deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with CSRF protection rules to block malicious requests targeting this vulnerability.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
Patchstack
Date Reserved
2025-04-09T11:20:21.866Z
Cvss Version
null
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69cd73e1e6bfc5ba1def3ef8

Added to database: 4/1/2026, 7:37:05 PM

Last enriched: 4/2/2026, 3:31:39 AM

Last updated: 4/6/2026, 9:30:18 AM

Views: 4

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses