CVE-2025-53100: RestDB codehooks-mcp-server · OS Command Injection
Affects RestDB codehooks-mcp-serverSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.6 High : upgrade to 0.2.2 soon.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC
- EPSS
- 1.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 69% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
- Patch
- Available – fixed in 0.2.2
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 1 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.
What to do
Upgrade restdb/codehooks-mcp-server to 0.2.2.
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
GitHubrestdb/codehooks-mcp-serverpkg:github/restdb/codehooks-mcp-serverOther threats | Affected
| Fixed in
|
Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.
AI-suggested
European organizations should immediately verify their use of RestDB Codehooks.io MCP Server and confirm the version in deployment. Systems running versions prior to 0.2.2 must be upgraded to the patched version without delay. Where immediate upgrade is not feasible, organizations should implement strict input validation and sanitization at the application layer to prevent injection of special characters or command delimiters. Network-level controls such as firewall rules should restrict access to the MCP Server to trusted IP addresses only. Monitoring and logging of MCP Server activities should be enhanced to detect anomalous command executions or unexpected user interactions. Employing Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect command injection patterns can provide an additional defense layer. User awareness training to reduce the risk of social engineering attacks that could trigger user interaction is also recommended. Finally, organizations should conduct penetration testing and code reviews focused on command injection vectors in their custom MCP Server tools implementations.
Description
RestDB's Codehooks.io MCP Server is an MCP server on the Codehooks.io platform. Prior to version 0.2.2, the MCP server is written in a way that is vulnerable to command injection attacks as part of some of its MCP Server tools definition and implementation. This could result in a user initiated remote command injection attack on a running MCP Server. This issue has been patched in version 0.2.2.
References
- github.com/RestDB/codehooks-mcp-server/security/advisories/GHSA-fhq6-jf5q-qxvq (opens in a new tab)
- github.com/RestDB/codehooks-mcp-server/commit/62f918a6fde6a8c700521b542b85315c70f05794 (opens in a new tab)
- github.com/RestDB/codehooks-mcp-server/commit/83db1d1b4c856cbe4a1b961d315706198bb0ffb8 (opens in a new tab)