VulnerabilityPublished 9 Jan 2026

CVE-2025-67280: tim-bpm-suite · SQL Injection: Hibernate

Affects tim-bpm-suiteSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.4 Medium : upgrade to 9.1.3 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.4Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 12% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 9.1.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 9 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade com.tim/tim-bpm-suite to 9.1.3.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Mavencom.tim/tim-bpm-suite`pkg:maven/com.tim/tim-bpm-suite`Other threats	Affected <9.1.3	Fixed in 9.1.3

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting access to TIM BPM Suite and TIM FLOW interfaces to trusted users and networks only, minimizing exposure to untrusted actors.
Implement strict input validation and parameterization of all HQL queries to prevent injection attacks; developers should review and refactor code to eliminate unsafe query constructions.
Monitor application logs for unusual query patterns or access attempts indicative of injection exploitation.
Enforce strong authentication and role-based access controls to limit the privileges of users, reducing the impact of any compromised account.
6. Conduct security assessments and penetration testing focused on injection vulnerabilities within BPM environments. 7. Educate users and administrators on recognizing suspicious activity and reporting incidents promptly. 8. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block HQL injection attempts as an interim protective measure.

Description

In TIM BPM Suite/ TIM FLOW through 9.1.2 multiple Hibernate Query Language injection vulnerabilities exist which allow a low privileged user to extract passwords of other users and access sensitive data of another user.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-67280 is substantial. TIM BPM Suite and TIM FLOW are used to manage and automate business processes, often containing sensitive operational, financial, and personal data. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized disclosure of user credentials and sensitive information, enabling attackers to escalate privileges, impersonate users, or exfiltrate confidential data. This can disrupt business continuity, damage reputation, and result in regulatory non-compliance, especially under GDPR requirements for data protection. Organizations in sectors such as finance, manufacturing, healthcare, and government that rely on these BPM platforms are particularly vulnerable. The breach of passwords could also facilitate further attacks across interconnected systems. The lack of known exploits currently provides a window for proactive mitigation, but the ease of exploitation by low privileged users increases urgency. The overall risk to confidentiality and integrity is high, with potential cascading effects on availability if attackers leverage stolen credentials for ransomware or sabotage.

CWE-564SQL Injection: Hibernate (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessOWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
Using Hibernate to execute a dynamic SQL statement built with user-controlled input can allow an attacker to modify the statement's meaning or to execute arbitrary SQL commands.
Requirements
A non-SQL style database which is not subject to this flaw may be chosen.
Architecture and Design
Follow the principle of least privilege when creating user accounts to a SQL database. Users should only have the minimum privileges necessary to use their account.
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Query Parameterization (opens in a new tab)
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.3.5 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Object Relational Mapping Injection (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 9 Jan 2026, 16:09 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-564

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats