CVE-2025-7592VulnerabilityPublished 14 Jul 2025Updated 15 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-7592: PHPGurukul Dairy Farm Shop Management System · SQL Injection

Affects PHPGurukul Dairy Farm Shop Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 33% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 14 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
PHPGurukul Dairy Farm Shop Management System	Affected =1.3	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately audit their use of the PHPGurukul Dairy Farm Shop Management System and identify any installations running version 1.3. In the absence of an official patch, the following specific mitigations are recommended: 1) Implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block SQL injection patterns targeting the 'del' parameter in invoices.php. 2) Employ parameterized queries or prepared statements in the application code to prevent injection if source code access and modification are possible. 3) Restrict database user permissions to the minimum necessary, avoiding use of high-privilege accounts for the web application. 4) Monitor database logs and application logs for suspicious queries or repeated failed attempts involving the 'del' parameter. 5) If feasible, isolate the affected system from external networks or limit access via VPN or IP whitelisting until a patch is available. 6) Conduct regular backups of critical data to enable recovery in case of data tampering. 7) Engage with the vendor or community to obtain updates or patches addressing this vulnerability. These targeted measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific vulnerable parameter and system context.

Description

A vulnerability has been found in PHPGurukul Dairy Farm Shop Management System 1.3 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file invoices.php. The manipulation of the argument del leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using the PHPGurukul Dairy Farm Shop Management System version 1.3, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized data access or manipulation within their dairy farm management operations. Given that the system likely manages sales, inventory, and invoicing data, exploitation could result in financial fraud, data breaches involving customer or supplier information, and disruption of business processes. The medium severity rating reflects limited but meaningful impact, especially if the database contains sensitive personal or financial data protected under GDPR. Additionally, compromised data integrity could affect operational decision-making and regulatory compliance. The remote exploitability without user interaction increases the risk of automated attacks or scanning by threat actors. Although no active exploits are known, the public disclosure of the vulnerability increases the likelihood of future exploitation attempts, necessitating prompt attention from affected organizations.

Summary

CVE-2025-7592 is a medium-severity SQL Injection vulnerability identified in version 1.3 of the PHPGurukul Dairy Farm Shop Management System, specifically within the invoices.php file. The vulnerability arises from improper sanitization or validation of the 'del' parameter, which an attacker can manipulate to inject malicious SQL code. This flaw allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the backend database without requiring authentication or user interaction. The vulnerability's CVSS 4.0 vector indicates it is remotely exploitable (AV:N), requires low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges (PR:L) but low privileges, no user interaction (UI:N), and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability to a limited extent (VC:L, VI:L, VA:L). The scope remains unchanged (S:N), and no special security controls are bypassed. Although the exploit has been publicly disclosed, there are no known active exploits in the wild at this time. The lack of available patches or mitigation links suggests that users of this system should be vigilant and consider immediate protective measures. SQL Injection vulnerabilities can allow attackers to extract sensitive data, modify or delete records, and potentially escalate their access within the system, posing a significant risk to data integrity and confidentiality.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 21 Jul 2025, 20:59 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats