Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-0800: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in specialk User Submitted Posts – Enable Users to Submit Posts from the Front End

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-0800cvecve-2026-0800cwe-79
Published: Sat Jan 24 2026 (01/24/2026, 08:26:32 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: specialk
Product: User Submitted Posts – Enable Users to Submit Posts from the Front End

Description

The User Submitted Posts – Enable Users to Submit Posts from the Front End plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the custom fields in all versions up to, and including, 20251210 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 02/01/2026, 08:29:23 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-0800 is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability identified in the WordPress plugin 'User Submitted Posts – Enable Users to Submit Posts from the Front End' developed by specialk. This plugin allows users to submit posts from the front end of a WordPress site, including custom fields. The vulnerability stems from insufficient sanitization and escaping of user-supplied input in these custom fields, enabling unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript code into posts. When other users visit the affected pages, the malicious scripts execute in their browsers under the context of the vulnerable site, potentially compromising user sessions, stealing cookies, or performing actions on behalf of users. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 20251210. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.2, reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, and a scope change indicating that the vulnerability affects components beyond the initially vulnerable plugin. The impact includes partial confidentiality and integrity loss, but no availability impact. No patches are currently linked, and no known exploits are reported in the wild, but the vulnerability's nature and ease of exploitation make it a significant risk. The plugin’s popularity among WordPress sites, especially those allowing user-generated content, increases the attack surface. Attackers can leverage this vulnerability to conduct phishing, session hijacking, or deliver malware payloads via injected scripts.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2026-0800 can be substantial, particularly for those operating public-facing WordPress sites that use the affected plugin to enable user-generated content. Exploitation can lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information such as session cookies or personal data, enabling account takeover or further attacks. Integrity of website content can be compromised, resulting in defacement or distribution of malicious content, which can damage organizational reputation and user trust. The vulnerability does not directly affect availability but can facilitate broader attacks that may disrupt services. Organizations in sectors like e-commerce, media, education, and government, which often rely on WordPress for content management and community engagement, are at higher risk. Additionally, compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations may be jeopardized if personal data is exposed or manipulated through this vulnerability, potentially leading to legal and financial penalties.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should immediately audit their WordPress installations to identify the presence of the 'User Submitted Posts – Enable Users to Submit Posts from the Front End' plugin. If present, they should upgrade to a patched version once available or temporarily disable the plugin to prevent exploitation. In the absence of an official patch, organizations can implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block suspicious input patterns targeting custom fields. Input validation and output encoding should be enforced at the application level, possibly by customizing the plugin code to sanitize inputs and escape outputs properly. Regular security scanning and monitoring for unusual activity or injected scripts on user-submitted content pages are recommended. Additionally, implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can help mitigate the impact of XSS by restricting script execution sources. User awareness training about phishing and suspicious links can reduce the risk of secondary attacks stemming from XSS exploitation.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2026-01-09T01:07:46.832Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6974846c4623b1157ca99ede

Added to database: 1/24/2026, 8:35:56 AM

Last enriched: 2/1/2026, 8:29:23 AM

Last updated: 2/6/2026, 11:10:01 AM

Views: 49

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats