VulnerabilityPublished 26 Sep 2026Updated 8 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-100525: openclaw diagnostics-prometheus · Missing Authorization

Affects openclaw diagnostics-prometheusSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium : upgrade to 2026.9.3 when convenient.

Data as of 9 Nov 2026, 23:24 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 15% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2026.9.3

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 26 Sep 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 9 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

ghsa-49qj-frf3-688h

What to do

Upgrade diagnostics-prometheus and @openclaw/diagnostics-prometheus to 2026.9.3.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
openclawdiagnostics-prometheus	Affected <2026.9.3	Fixed in 2026.9.3
npm@openclaw/diagnostics-prometheus`pkg:npm/@openclaw/diagnostics-prometheus`Other threats	Affected <2026.9.3	Fixed in 2026.9.3

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Upgrade to OpenClaw diagnostics-prometheus version 2026.9.3 or later, where the issue is fixed. As a workaround, disable the Prometheus metrics endpoint or ensure that only identities with the operator.read scope can access it.

Description

CVE-2026-100525 is a medium severity vulnerability in the OpenClaw diagnostics-prometheus plugin before version 2026.9.3. The plugin fails to enforce the operator.read scope on its authenticated metrics endpoint, allowing authenticated users without read scope to access operational metrics. This affects deployments using identity-bearing Gateway authentication modes like trusted-proxy. The issue is fixed in version 2026.9.3. Workarounds include disabling the Prometheus endpoint or restricting access to identities with operator.read scope.

Impact

Authenticated users without the operator.read scope can access operational metrics via the Prometheus diagnostics endpoint, potentially exposing sensitive operational information. This unauthorized access bypasses intended read restrictions in identity-bearing Gateway authentication modes. However, shared-secret Gateway callers are not affected. There are no known exploits in the wild.

Summary

The OpenClaw Prometheus diagnostics plugin (@openclaw/diagnostics-prometheus) versions prior to 2026.9.3 do not enforce the operator.read scope on their authenticated metrics endpoint. In environments using identity-bearing Gateway authentication modes such as trusted-proxy, an authenticated caller whose effective role lacks read scope can retrieve the diagnostics document. This results in unauthorized disclosure of operational metrics to profiles intentionally limited below read access. Shared-secret Gateway callers are unaffected as they already have full operator scope. The vulnerability is resolved in version 2026.9.3.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 10 Oct 2026, 20:24 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats