VulnerabilityPublished 26 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-101259: Apache Camel · Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information

Affects Apache CamelSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium : upgrade to 4.22.2 or 4.18.5 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:30 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 27% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 4.22.2, 4.18.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 26 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Apache to 4.22.2 or 4.18.5.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Apache Camelorg.apache.camel:camel-coap	Affected >=4.19.0 <4.22.2	Fixed in 4.22.2
Apache Camelorg.apache.camel:camel-coap	Affected >=4.0.0 <4.18.5	Fixed in 4.18.5
MavenApache Software Foundation/org.apache.camel:camel-coap`pkg:maven/Apache Software Foundation/org.apache.camel:camel-coap`Other threats	Affected >=4.0.0 <4.18.5 >=4.19.0 <4.22.2	Fixed in 4.18.5 4.22.2

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Users should upgrade Apache Camel to versions 4.18.5, 4.22.2, or later 4.23.0, where the issue is fixed and the muteException option is enabled by default to suppress sensitive error payloads. For deployments unable to upgrade immediately, ensure that the response can always be built once the route has completed by converting the body to byte[] or String as the last step of each route consuming from a CoAP endpoint. Additionally, restrict CamelCoapMaxAge and CamelCoapETag headers to values of their own types and add an onException handler that marks failures as handled and sets the response body explicitly. This prevents conversion failures outside the route and suppresses sensitive error details.

Description

CVE-2026-101259 is a vulnerability in the Apache Camel CoAP component affecting versions from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5 and from 4.19.0 before 4.22.2. It allows generation of error messages containing sensitive internal information such as class names, file paths, host names, and connection details. This occurs when the CoAP consumer fails to build its response after route completion and returns detailed exception messages in a 5.00 Internal Server Error response. The issue is fixed in Apache Camel versions 4.18.5, 4.22.2, and later 4.23.0. Users are advised to upgrade to these fixed versions to prevent sensitive information disclosure.

Impact

This vulnerability allows remote CoAP clients to receive error messages containing sensitive internal information about the deployment environment, such as class names, file paths, host names, and connection details. Disclosure of such information can aid attackers in reconnaissance and further exploitation. The CVSS score is 5.3 (medium severity), reflecting limited confidentiality impact without direct integrity or availability consequences. There is no known exploitation in the wild.

CWE-209Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighOWASP Top 10 A10:2025: Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions (opens in a new tab)
The product generates an error message that includes sensitive information about its environment, users, or associated data.
Implementation
Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended).
Implementation
Handle exceptions internally and do not display errors containing potentially sensitive information to a user.
Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Use naming conventions and strong types to make it easier to spot when sensitive data is being used. When creating structures, objects, or other complex entities, separate the sensitive and non-sensitive data as much as possible.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Error Handling (opens in a new tab)
Logging (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V14.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V7.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Fuzzing for application mapping (opens in a new tab)
Padding Oracle Crypto Attack (opens in a new tab)
Query System for Information (opens in a new tab)
Blind SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 26 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-209

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats