CVE-2026-1093: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in creativewerkdesigns WPFAQBlock– FAQ & Accordion Plugin For Gutenberg
The WPFAQBlock– FAQ & Accordion Plugin For Gutenberg plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'class' parameter of the 'wpfaqblock' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-1093 identifies a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the WPFAQBlock – FAQ & Accordion Plugin for Gutenberg, a WordPress plugin developed by creativewerkdesigns. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of user input (CWE-79) specifically in the 'class' parameter of the 'wpfaqblock' shortcode. The plugin fails to adequately sanitize and escape this parameter, allowing authenticated users with Contributor-level access or higher to inject arbitrary JavaScript code into pages. Because the malicious script is stored, it executes every time any user accesses the affected page, potentially compromising user sessions, stealing cookies, or performing unauthorized actions within the context of the victim’s browser. The vulnerability affects all plugin versions up to 1.1 and was publicly disclosed on March 21, 2026. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 6.4, indicating medium severity, with an attack vector over the network, low attack complexity, privileges required at the Contributor level, no user interaction needed, and a scope change affecting confidentiality and integrity but not availability. No patches or fixes have been linked yet, and no known exploits are currently in the wild, but the vulnerability poses a significant risk due to the widespread use of WordPress and the common deployment of this plugin for FAQ and accordion features on websites.
Potential Impact
The impact of this vulnerability is primarily on the confidentiality and integrity of data within affected WordPress sites. An attacker with Contributor-level access can inject malicious scripts that execute in the browsers of any users visiting the compromised pages. This can lead to session hijacking, theft of authentication cookies, defacement of website content, or redirection to malicious sites. Because the vulnerability is stored XSS, the malicious payload persists and affects all visitors until remediated. Organizations relying on this plugin for their websites risk reputational damage, data breaches, and potential compromise of user accounts. The attack does not affect availability directly but can indirectly cause service disruption through defacement or loss of user trust. Given the ease of exploitation (low complexity, no user interaction), the threat is significant especially for sites with multiple contributors or editors who could be coerced or compromised to inject malicious content.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should immediately upgrade the WPFAQBlock plugin to a version that addresses the issue once available. Until a patch is released, administrators should restrict Contributor-level permissions to trusted users only and audit existing content for injected scripts. Implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with rules to detect and block suspicious script injections in shortcode parameters can provide temporary protection. Additionally, site owners should enforce Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts. Regularly scanning the website for XSS payloads and monitoring user activity for unusual behavior can help detect exploitation attempts. Developers maintaining the plugin should implement proper input validation, sanitization, and output escaping for all user-supplied attributes, especially shortcode parameters. Finally, educating content contributors about secure content practices reduces the risk of accidental injection.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, India, France, Brazil, Netherlands, Japan
CVE-2026-1093: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in creativewerkdesigns WPFAQBlock– FAQ & Accordion Plugin For Gutenberg
Description
The WPFAQBlock– FAQ & Accordion Plugin For Gutenberg plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'class' parameter of the 'wpfaqblock' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-1093 identifies a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the WPFAQBlock – FAQ & Accordion Plugin for Gutenberg, a WordPress plugin developed by creativewerkdesigns. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of user input (CWE-79) specifically in the 'class' parameter of the 'wpfaqblock' shortcode. The plugin fails to adequately sanitize and escape this parameter, allowing authenticated users with Contributor-level access or higher to inject arbitrary JavaScript code into pages. Because the malicious script is stored, it executes every time any user accesses the affected page, potentially compromising user sessions, stealing cookies, or performing unauthorized actions within the context of the victim’s browser. The vulnerability affects all plugin versions up to 1.1 and was publicly disclosed on March 21, 2026. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 6.4, indicating medium severity, with an attack vector over the network, low attack complexity, privileges required at the Contributor level, no user interaction needed, and a scope change affecting confidentiality and integrity but not availability. No patches or fixes have been linked yet, and no known exploits are currently in the wild, but the vulnerability poses a significant risk due to the widespread use of WordPress and the common deployment of this plugin for FAQ and accordion features on websites.
Potential Impact
The impact of this vulnerability is primarily on the confidentiality and integrity of data within affected WordPress sites. An attacker with Contributor-level access can inject malicious scripts that execute in the browsers of any users visiting the compromised pages. This can lead to session hijacking, theft of authentication cookies, defacement of website content, or redirection to malicious sites. Because the vulnerability is stored XSS, the malicious payload persists and affects all visitors until remediated. Organizations relying on this plugin for their websites risk reputational damage, data breaches, and potential compromise of user accounts. The attack does not affect availability directly but can indirectly cause service disruption through defacement or loss of user trust. Given the ease of exploitation (low complexity, no user interaction), the threat is significant especially for sites with multiple contributors or editors who could be coerced or compromised to inject malicious content.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should immediately upgrade the WPFAQBlock plugin to a version that addresses the issue once available. Until a patch is released, administrators should restrict Contributor-level permissions to trusted users only and audit existing content for injected scripts. Implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with rules to detect and block suspicious script injections in shortcode parameters can provide temporary protection. Additionally, site owners should enforce Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts. Regularly scanning the website for XSS payloads and monitoring user activity for unusual behavior can help detect exploitation attempts. Developers maintaining the plugin should implement proper input validation, sanitization, and output escaping for all user-supplied attributes, especially shortcode parameters. Finally, educating content contributors about secure content practices reduces the risk of accidental injection.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2026-01-16T21:28:21.859Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69be1806f4197a8e3b783b9a
Added to database: 3/21/2026, 4:01:10 AM
Last enriched: 3/21/2026, 5:01:51 AM
Last updated: 3/22/2026, 6:57:56 AM
Views: 6
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.