CVE-2026-111765: CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials in a2aproject a2a-java

The GHSA-9rhm fix added this safe setting in AndroidA2AHttpClient.createConnection(): connection.setInstanceFollowRedirects(false); The synchronous POST builder later overwrites it: private boolean followRedirects = true; public A2AHttpResponse post() throws IOException { HttpURLConnection connection = createConnection("POST", false); connection.setInstanceFollowRedirects(followRedirects); // ... } The second assignment wins. JSONRPCTransport and RestTransport both add interceptor-produced headers and call synchronous post() without setting followRedirects(false). On Android's repackaged OkHttp implementation, a cross-authority redirect strips Authorization but retains nonstandard request headers. AuthInterceptor permits four nonstandard authentication header names: X-API-Key API-Key X-Auth-Token X-Authentication I confirmed that the exact v1.3.1.Final Maven artifact forwards complete synthetic values under all four names to a second loopback authority. I also reproduced the supported AuthInterceptor to Android POST path. Explicitly calling followRedirects(false) returns the original 302 and produces no request to the collector. All test traffic stayed on two ephemeral 127.0.0.1 listeners. All credentials were synthetic FULCRUM-SYNTHETIC-* values. Reproduction I have attached AndroidA2AHttpClientRedirectTest.java. Copy it to: extras/http-client-android/src/test/java/org/a2aproject/sdk/client/http/android/ Run: mvn -pl extras/http-client-android -am \ -Dtest=AndroidA2AHttpClientRedirectTest \ -Dsurefire.failIfNoSpecifiedTests=false test On unpatched current main, the default test fails with: Android synchronous POST must retain the documented no-redirect default expected: <302> but was: <200> The explicit followRedirects(true) control still passes. The separate exact-artifact fixture passed three consecutive runs. Its relevant output was: default status=200 x-api-key=FULCRUM-SYNTHETIC-DIRECT authorization=null method=GET control-followRedirects-false status=302 collectorHits=0 interceptor-chain status=200 x-api-key=FULCRUM-SYNTHETIC-INTERCEPTOR collectorHits=1 header-matrix name=X-API-Key forwarded=FULCRUM-SYNTHETIC-X-API-Key header-matrix name=API-Key forwarded=FULCRUM-SYNTHETIC-API-Key header-matrix name=X-Auth-Token forwarded=FULCRUM-SYNTHETIC-X-Auth-Token header-matrix name=X-Authentication forwarded=FULCRUM-SYNTHETIC-X-Authentication Impact and limitations The demonstrated impact is disclosure of a complete API key or authentication token to a different authority. I am not claiming subsequent use of the credential, integrity impact, availability impact, code execution, or host compromise. A fully malicious origin already receives the credential on the first request. The additional boundary matters most when redirect or front-door behavior is compromised separately from the component that handles request credentials, or when different parts of the origin operate in different trust domains. The 7.5 score applies to an autonomous client where no human action is needed after the remote endpoint returns the redirect. If the Android workflow requires a person to select or invoke the remote agent, UI:R gives a 6.5 score. I have kept both vectors because that deployment detail affects severity but not the underlying behavior. These are suggested scores, consistent with the policy's statement that actual CVSS depends on the specific deployment context. The same policy labels the parent credential-redirect property as moderate. Scope and prior art This path appears to fall directly under the project's current security model: 1. extras/http-client-android and the client transports are listed as in scope. 2. Remote AgentCard and response data are treated as attacker-relevant inputs. 3. A malicious or compromised remote agent is part of the client-side adversary model. 4. Section 8 says automatic redirects are disabled in all JDK, Vert.x, and Android implementations to prevent credential leakage. 5. Section 13 defines a violation of a Section 8 property through the covered input and adversary as VALID. 6. Section 13a lists missed call sites and under-strength mitigations as new findings after an incomplete fix. 7. Section 14 records the original issue as fixed by disabling redirects across all HTTP client implementations. The Android synchronous path directly contradicts that recorded repair state. This report does not claim that an AgentCard SecurityScheme declaration enforces authentication. The application has already configured the credential, and the shipped AuthInterceptor places it in an allowed header. The failure is the Android client's default redirect behavior after that point. It does not depend on a custom SPI, an insecure configuration flag, a test-only component, server-side authentication, or any of the recurring non-findings listed in Section 11a. GHSA-9rhm is t