VulnerabilityPublished 29 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-113617: Automated Import Products to Cart (WordPress plugin) · Path Traversal

Affects Automated Import Products to Cart (WordPress plugin)Source CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited : upgrade to 1.0.4 soon.

Data as of 29 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC

Severity

High

Rated High by Threat Radar's AI analysis · CVSS not yet scored by NVD

Thin evidence

One scorer or none

Patch: Available – fixed in 1.0.4

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Automated Import Products to Cart (WordPress plugin) to 1.0.4.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Automated Import Products to Cart	Affected <1.0.4	Fixed in 1.0.4

AI-suggested

A fixed version 1.0.4 of the Automated Import Products to Cart plugin is available that addresses this vulnerability. Users should upgrade to version 1.0.4 or later to remediate this issue. No additional mitigation steps are indicated beyond applying this official fix.

Description

The Automated Import Products to Cart WordPress plugin before version 1.0.4 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows users with minimal permissions, such as subscribers, to read and delete arbitrary files on the server. This occurs because the plugin does not properly sanitize user-supplied file paths before using them for file operations.

Impact

Exploitation of this vulnerability allows an attacker with minimal permissions (e.g., subscriber role) to read sensitive files on the server, such as those containing database credentials, and to delete arbitrary files. This can lead to data exposure and potential denial of service or further compromise of the affected system.

Summary

CVE-2026-113617 is a path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) in the Automated Import Products to Cart WordPress plugin versions prior to 1.0.4. The flaw arises from insufficient sanitization of user-supplied file paths, enabling low-privileged users to read arbitrary files, including sensitive files like those containing database credentials, and to delete arbitrary files on the server. This elevates the risk of unauthorized data disclosure and potential disruption of server files.

CWE-22Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #6OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks…
Implementation · Input Validation
Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174).
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Path Traversal (opens in a new tab)
Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic (opens in a new tab)
Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls (opens in a new tab)
Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding (opens in a new tab)
Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

wpscan.com/vulnerability/450a5f9e-3b4c-495d-975f-a24a3d458651/ (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 29 Oct 2026, 06:23 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-22

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats