Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished

CVE-2026-118586: dfm feedfinder2 · Server-Side Request Forgery

Affects dfm feedfinder2Source CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 28 Oct 2026, 23:57 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
6.9Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 28 Oct 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
dfmfeedfinder2Affected
  • 0.0.1 – 0.0.4
4 affected builds
Fixed in–
PyPIfeedfinder2pkg:pypi/feedfinder2Other threatsAffected
  • 0.0.1 – 0.0.4
4 affected builds
Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

  • cpe:2.3:a:dfm:feedfinder2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Users should monitor the project for updates and consider implementing network-level restrictions to limit the server's ability to make arbitrary outbound requests as a temporary mitigation.

Description

CVE-2026-118586 is a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the dfm feedfinder2 project affecting versions 0.0.1 through 0.0.4. The flaw exists in the find_feeds function of feedfinder2.py, allowing remote attackers to manipulate requests and potentially cause the server to make unintended requests. The vulnerability has a medium severity rating with a CVSS score of 6.9. No patch or vendor response has been reported yet.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…