VulnerabilityPublished 30 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-119545: forgejo · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Affects forgejoSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 12:04 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Thin evidence

One scorer or none

CVSS scores by source
CNA (VulnCheck)	CVSS 4.0	6.9
CNA (VulnCheck)	CVSS 3.1	5.3
CNA	CVSS 4.0	6.9

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 30 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
forgejoforgejo	Affected <=15.0.11 >=16.0.0 <=16.0.7 >=17.0.0 <=17.0.1	Fixed in–
GitHubforgejo/forgejo`pkg:github/forgejo/forgejo`Other threats	Affected <=15.0.11 >=16.0.0 <=16.0.7 >=17.0.0 <=17.0.1	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Until a fix is available, consider restricting access to the /user/login/openid endpoint or implementing network-level controls to limit the server's ability to make outbound requests to internal or sensitive network addresses.

Description

Forgejo versions through 15.0.11, 16.0.0 through 16.0.7, and 17.0.0 through 17.0.1 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. This flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to submit crafted OpenID identifier URLs to the /user/login/openid endpoint, causing the server to make arbitrary HTTP GET requests. These requests can target internal network resources such as loopback addresses, cloud metadata services, and other internal hosts, enabling port scanning and probing activities.

Impact

The vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to induce the Forgejo server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or otherwise inaccessible network resources. This can lead to information disclosure about internal network infrastructure, such as open ports and services, by leveraging blind SSRF techniques. There is no indication of direct remote code execution or data compromise from this vulnerability alone. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.9 (medium severity), reflecting network attack vector, no privileges or user interaction required, and low impact on confidentiality.

Summary

CVE-2026-119545 is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in Forgejo affecting versions up to 15.0.11, 16.0.0 through 16.0.7, and 17.0.0 through 17.0.1. The vulnerability arises from the handling of OpenID identifier URLs submitted during login. An unauthenticated attacker can POST specially crafted identifiers to the /user/login/openid endpoint, triggering the server to perform blind discovery GET requests to internal network addresses. This can be exploited to scan internal services and potentially gather sensitive information about the internal network topology.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 30 Oct 2026, 11:51 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats