Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished

CVE-2026-16792: Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator · Improper Certificate Validation

Affects Lenovo XClarity OrchestratorSource CVE Database V5

0
Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.1 Medium.

Data as of 2 Nov 2026, 22:58 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
6.1Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 1% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 4 Aug 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2 Nov 2026.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
LenovoXClarity OrchestratorAffected
  • <=2.2.0
Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Until an official fix is available, users should consider limiting network exposure of affected services and use network-level protections to reduce the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks. Monitor Lenovo communications for updates on patches or mitigations.

Description

CVE-2026-16792 is an improper certificate validation vulnerability in multiple Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator 2.2.0 microservices. This flaw could allow an adjacent network attacker to intercept sensitive communications by performing a machine-in-the-middle attack on HTTPS connections during TLS certificate validation under certain conditions. The vulnerability has a medium severity score of 6.1 and no known exploits in the wild. No official patch or remediation guidance has been provided yet.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…