Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished

CVE-2026-18709: MongoDB Server · Missing Authorization

Affects MongoDB ServerSource CVE Database V5

0
Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.9 Medium · fixed in 8.3.8 : update MongoDB Server when convenient.

Data as of 9 Nov 2026, 23:24 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
5.9Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 9% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in 8.3.8, 8.0.29, 7.0.40
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 11 Aug 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 10 Nov 2026.

What to do

Upgrade MongoDB Server to 8.3.8, 8.0.29 or 7.0.40.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
MongoDBMongoDB ServerAffected
  • >=8.3.0 <8.3.8
Fixed in
  • 8.3.8
MongoDBMongoDB ServerAffected
  • >=8.0 <8.0.29
Fixed in
  • 8.0.29
MongoDBMongoDB ServerAffected
  • >=7.0 <7.0.40
Fixed in
  • 7.0.40

AI-suggested

If you cannot patch yet, limit authenticated user access to shards and restrict network access to trusted users only to reduce the risk of exploitation.

Description

An issue in MongoDB Server could allow an authenticated user with direct network access to a shard to improperly commit or abort an in-progress prepared transaction, bypassing the intended transaction coordination process. This could result in cross-shard data inconsistency, cluster clock corruption, and violation of transaction atomicity guarantees.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…