VulnerabilityPublished 17 Aug 2026Updated 18 Aug 2026

CVE-2026-19984: jkawamoto mcp-florence2 · Server-Side Request Forgery

Affects jkawamoto mcp-florence2Source CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 14 Nov 2026, 20:44 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 30% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Aug 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 14 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
jkawamotomcp-florence2	Affected 0.3.0 – 0.3.13 14 affected builds	Fixed in–
PyPImcp-florence2`pkg:pypi/mcp-florence2`Other threats	Affected 0.3.0 – 0.3.13 14 affected builds	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:jkawamoto:mcp-florence2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

The vendor recommends mitigating the risk by routing all HTTP(S) requests through an SSRF-safe proxy server. This approach prevents exploitation without requiring changes to the mcp-florence2 source code. Users should implement this mitigation as soon as possible to reduce exposure.

Description

A flaw has been found in jkawamoto mcp-florence2 up to 0.3.13. Affected by this issue is the function get_images of the file src/mcp_florence2/__init__.py. This manipulation of the argument src causes server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. It is recommended to change the configuration settings. The vendor explains: "For deployments where SSRF protection is required, I recommend routing all HTTP(S) requests through an SSRF-safe proxy server. This approach mitigates the vulnerability without requiring changes to the mcp-florence2 source code."

Impact

Successful exploitation of this SSRF vulnerability could allow an attacker to make unauthorized HTTP(S) requests from the vulnerable server, potentially accessing internal services or resources not otherwise exposed. The impact is rated medium due to limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability effects. There are no known exploits in the wild at this time.

Summary

This vulnerability in jkawamoto mcp-florence2 up to version 0.3.13 allows an attacker to perform server-side request forgery via the get_images function by manipulating the src argument. SSRF can enable attackers to make unauthorized requests from the server to internal or external resources. The vendor has not released a patch but suggests using an SSRF-safe proxy server to mitigate the risk. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 5.3 (medium severity), reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, and limited impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…