VulnerabilityPublished 18 Feb 2026Updated 19 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-23212: Linux kernel · bonding: annotate data-races around slave->last_rx

Affects Linux kernelSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · fixed in f6c3665b6dc53c3ab7d31b585446a953a74340ef : update Linux kernel when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 13:47 UTC

Severity

Unrated

Rated by Threat Radar · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

EPSS

0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 0% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

Exploitation: No evidence of active exploitation and no public proof of concept
Automatable: Attackers cannot reliably automate steps 1–4 of the kill chain
Technical impact: Limited control over the software or limited information exposure

CISA SSVC assessment, 2026-06-10.

Patch

Available – fixed in f6c3665b6dc53c3ab7d31b585446a953a74340ef, bd98324e327e41de04b13e372cc16f73150df254, b956289b83887e0a306067b6003c3fcd81bfdf84 +2

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade to a fixed release listed under Affected software.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
LinuxLinux	Affected ≥ f5b2b966f032f22d3a289045a5afd4afa09f09c6, < f6c3665b6dc53c3ab7d31b585446a953a74340ef	Fixed in f6c3665b6dc53c3ab7d31b585446a953a74340ef
LinuxLinux	Affected ≥ f5b2b966f032f22d3a289045a5afd4afa09f09c6, < bd98324e327e41de04b13e372cc16f73150df254	Fixed in bd98324e327e41de04b13e372cc16f73150df254
LinuxLinux	Affected ≥ f5b2b966f032f22d3a289045a5afd4afa09f09c6, < b956289b83887e0a306067b6003c3fcd81bfdf84	Fixed in b956289b83887e0a306067b6003c3fcd81bfdf84
LinuxLinux	Affected ≥ f5b2b966f032f22d3a289045a5afd4afa09f09c6, < a7516cb0165926d308187e231ccd330e5e3ebff7	Fixed in a7516cb0165926d308187e231ccd330e5e3ebff7
LinuxLinux	Affected ≥ f5b2b966f032f22d3a289045a5afd4afa09f09c6, < 8c0be3277e7aefb2f900fc37ca3fe7df362e26f5	Fixed in 8c0be3277e7aefb2f900fc37ca3fe7df362e26f5
LinuxLinux	Affected =2.6.19	Fixed in–

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bonding: annotate data-races around slave->last_rx slave->last_rx and slave->target_last_arp_rx[...] can be read and written locklessly. Add READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() annotations. syzbot reported: BUG: KCSAN: data-race in bond_rcv_validate / bond_rcv_validate write to 0xffff888149f0d428 of 8 bytes by interrupt on cpu 1: bond_rcv_validate+0x202/0x7a0 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:3335 bond_handle_frame+0xde/0x5e0 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:1533 __netif_receive_skb_core+0x5b1/0x1950 net/core/dev.c:6039 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:6150 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x59/0x270 net/core/dev.c:6265 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:6351 [inline] netif_receive_skb+0x4b/0x2d0 net/core/dev.c:6410 ... write to 0xffff888149f0d428 of 8 bytes by interrupt on cpu 0: bond_rcv_validate+0x202/0x7a0 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:3335 bond_handle_frame+0xde/0x5e0 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:1533 __netif_receive_skb_core+0x5b1/0x1950 net/core/dev.c:6039 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:6150 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x59/0x270 net/core/dev.c:6265 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:6351 [inline] netif_receive_skb+0x4b/0x2d0 net/core/dev.c:6410 br_netif_receive_skb net/bridge/br_input.c:30 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:318 [inline] ... value changed: 0x0000000100005365 -> 0x0000000100005366

CWE-362Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: MediumOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.
Architecture and Design
In languages that support it, use synchronization primitives. Only wrap these around critical code to minimize the impact on performance.
Architecture and Design
Use thread-safe capabilities such as the data access abstraction in Spring.
Architecture and Design
Minimize the usage of shared resources in order to remove as much complexity as possible from the control flow and to reduce the likelihood of unexpected conditions occurring.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V1.11.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Leveraging Time-of-Check and Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Race Conditions (opens in a new tab)
Leveraging Race Conditions (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

WeaknessesCWE-362

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats