VulnerabilityPublished 11 Aug 2026Updated 5 Nov 2026

CVE-2026-24330: Red Hat Fuse 7 · Unrestricted File Upload

Affects Red Hat Fuse 7Source CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.5 Medium.

Data as of 9 Nov 2026, 11:38 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Thin evidence

One scorer or none

CVSS scores by source
CNA (redhat)	CVSS 3.1	6.5

EPSS: 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 44% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable component that could affect component-wide settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Aug 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 9 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Red Hat Fuse 7wildfly-core-security	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7wildfly-core-security	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8wildfly-core-security	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Packwildfly-core-security	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red Hat Process Automation 7wildfly-core-security	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red Hat Single Sign-On 7wildfly-core-security	Affected–	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Mitigation involves restricting access to the 'deployer' account to authorized and trusted administrators only, implementing strong authentication policies, and limiting deployer permissions to prevent deployment of untrusted applications. WildFly management interfaces should not be exposed to untrusted networks, and only verified and signed applications should be permitted for deployment. If the 'deployer' role is not necessary, consider disabling or removing it. Configuration changes may require a service restart.

Description

A flaw was found in wildfly-core. A remote attacker, authenticated as a 'deployer' account, can import and deploy a malicious archive file from an untrusted source. This is achieved by leveraging WildFly libraries to craft a Java project that allows an HTTP POST request to upload and deploy the malicious archive. This could lead to further exploitation, such as arbitrary file read vulnerabilities.

Impact

An attacker authenticated as a 'deployer' can deploy malicious archives, potentially leading to arbitrary file read vulnerabilities and compromise of confidentiality and integrity. There is no impact on availability. The attack vector is network-based with low complexity and no user interaction required. The vulnerability does not allow unauthenticated exploitation, limiting its impact to those with deployer privileges.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats