Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-2862: CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in IBM Verify Identity Access Container

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-2862cvecve-2026-2862cwe-444
Published: Wed Apr 01 2026 (04/01/2026, 20:41:04 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: IBM
Product: Verify Identity Access Container

Description

IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information due to an inconsistent interpretation of an HTTP request by a reverse proxy.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 04/01/2026, 21:24:24 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-2862 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-444, involving inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests by a reverse proxy in IBM Verify Identity Access Container (versions 11.0 through 11.0.2) and IBM Security Verify Access Container (versions 10.0 through 10.0.9.1). HTTP Request/Response Smuggling occurs when an attacker crafts specially formed HTTP requests that are parsed differently by front-end proxies and back-end servers, allowing the attacker to bypass security controls, inject malicious requests, or access sensitive data. In this case, the inconsistent parsing enables a remote attacker to access sensitive information without requiring authentication or user interaction. The vulnerability affects network-exposed components that handle identity and access management, making it a significant concern for organizations relying on these IBM products for secure authentication and authorization. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.3, reflecting a medium severity with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction needed. Although no exploits are currently known in the wild, the nature of HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities historically has allowed attackers to bypass security controls, steal session tokens, or perform web cache poisoning. The lack of published patches means organizations must rely on mitigations until vendor updates are released.

Potential Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is unauthorized access to sensitive information, which can compromise confidentiality within affected environments. Since the vulnerability does not affect integrity or availability directly, the risk is focused on data leakage. Exploitation could lead to exposure of authentication tokens, user credentials, or other sensitive identity-related data managed by IBM Verify Identity Access Container. This can facilitate further attacks such as privilege escalation or lateral movement within an enterprise network. Organizations using these IBM products in critical identity and access management roles, especially those with internet-facing components, are at risk. The medium severity score indicates moderate risk, but the ease of exploitation (no authentication or user interaction required) increases the urgency to address the issue. The absence of known exploits currently reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate it, as attackers may develop exploits once details become widely known.

Mitigation Recommendations

Until official patches are released by IBM, organizations should implement the following mitigations: 1) Review and harden reverse proxy configurations to ensure consistent HTTP request parsing, including disabling ambiguous HTTP header parsing and enforcing strict adherence to HTTP standards. 2) Deploy Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block HTTP request smuggling patterns. 3) Monitor network traffic for anomalous or malformed HTTP requests that could indicate exploitation attempts. 4) Segment and isolate identity and access management infrastructure to limit exposure. 5) Apply strict input validation and logging on all HTTP requests passing through proxies. 6) Engage with IBM support to obtain guidance and prioritize patch deployment once available. 7) Conduct internal penetration testing focusing on HTTP request smuggling techniques to identify potential weaknesses in the environment. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific attack vector and affected components.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
ibm
Date Reserved
2026-02-20T14:15:32.610Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69cd8944e6bfc5ba1dfc32e2

Added to database: 4/1/2026, 9:08:20 PM

Last enriched: 4/1/2026, 9:24:24 PM

Last updated: 4/6/2026, 8:40:24 AM

Views: 33

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses