CVE-2026-29055VulnerabilityPublished 26 Mar 2026Updated 27 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-29055: TandoorRecipes recipes · Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Metadata

Affects TandoorRecipes recipesSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium : upgrade to 2.6.0 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 24% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.6.0

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 26 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade recipes and tandoorrecipes/recipes to 2.6.0.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
TandoorRecipesrecipes	Affected <2.6.0	Fixed in 2.6.0
GitHubtandoorrecipes/recipes`pkg:github/tandoorrecipes/recipes`Other threats	Affected <2.6.0	Fixed in 2.6.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Upgrade Tandoor Recipes to version 2.6.0 or later, where the issue is fixed by properly stripping EXIF metadata from WebP and GIF images. No other mitigation is required as the fix is available in the official release.

Description

Tandoor Recipes versions prior to 2.6.0 do not strip EXIF metadata from uploaded WebP and GIF images. This leads to exposure of sensitive information such as GPS coordinates, camera model, timestamps, and software details to any user who can view the recipe images. The issue is fixed in version 2.6.0.

Impact

Sensitive user information embedded in image metadata such as GPS coordinates, camera model, timestamps, and software details can be accessed by any user viewing the affected recipe images. This exposure can lead to privacy violations but does not affect data integrity or availability.

Summary

The vulnerability CVE-2026-29055 in Tandoor Recipes (versions before 2.6.0) arises because the image processing pipeline explicitly skips stripping EXIF metadata, image rescaling, and size validation for WebP and GIF formats. As a result, sensitive metadata embedded in images, including geolocation and device information, is exposed to all users with access to the recipe images. This is a known issue acknowledged by a developer comment and is addressed in version 2.6.0.

CWE-1230Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Metadata (opens in a new tab)
Base weakness
The product prevents direct access to a resource containing sensitive information, but it does not sufficiently limit access to metadata that is derived from the original, sensitive information.
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Apr 2026, 13:35 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-1230

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats