Skip to main content
CVE-2026-31842VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-31842: Tinyproxy · HTTP Request/Response Smuggling

Affects TinyproxySource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.7 High : upgrade to 1.11.4 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
8.7High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 47% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in 1.11.4
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 7 Apr 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

What to do

Upgrade tinyproxy/tinyproxy to 1.11.4.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Tinyproxy ProjectTinyproxyAffected
  • <=1.11.3
Fixed in–
GitHubtinyproxy/tinyproxypkg:github/tinyproxy/tinyproxyOther threatsAffected
  • <1.11.4
Fixed in
  • 1.11.4
GitHubTinyproxypkg:github/TinyproxyOther threatsAffected
  • <=1.11.3
Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

No temporary or official fixes have been documented at this time.

Description

Tinyproxy through 1.11.3 is vulnerable to HTTP request parsing desynchronization due to a case-sensitive comparison of the Transfer-Encoding header in src/reqs.c. The is_chunked_transfer function uses strcmp to compare the header value against "chunked", even though RFC 7230 specifies that transfer-coding names are case-insensitive.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…