VulnerabilityPublished 14 Apr 2026

CVE-2026-33892: Siemens Industrial Edge Management Pro V1 · Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness

Affects Siemens Industrial Edge Management Pro V1Source CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.1 High : upgrade to 1.15.17 soon.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.1High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 11% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 1.15.17, 2.1.1, 2.8.0

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 14 Apr 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Industrial Edge Management to 1.15.17 (Pro V1) or 2.1.1 (Pro V2) or 2.8.0 (Virtual).

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SiemensIndustrial Edge Management Pro V1	Affected >=1.7.6 <1.15.17	Fixed in 1.15.17
SiemensIndustrial Edge Management Pro V2	Affected >=2.0.0 <2.1.1	Fixed in 2.1.1
SiemensIndustrial Edge Management Virtual	Affected >=2.2.0 <2.8.0	Fixed in 2.8.0

AI-suggested

If you cannot patch yet, organizations should consider disabling the remote connection feature if not required, restrict network access to the management system to trusted sources, and monitor for any unusual remote connection attempts. Follow Siemens' official advisories for updates on patches or mitigations.

Description

A vulnerability has been identified in Industrial Edge Management Pro V1 (All versions >= V1.7.6 < V1.15.17), Industrial Edge Management Pro V2 (All versions >= V2.0.0 < V2.1.1), Industrial Edge Management Virtual (All versions >= V2.2.0 < V2.8.0). Affected management systems do not properly enforce user authentication on remote connections to devices. This could facilitate an unauthenticated remote attacker to circumvent authentication and impersonate a legitimate user. Successful exploitation requires that the attacker has identified the header and port used for remote connections to devices and that the remote connection feature is enabled for the device. Exploitation allows the attacker to tunnel to the device. Security features on this device itself (e.g.app specific authentication) are not affected.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass authentication controls on remote connections to devices managed by the affected Siemens Industrial Edge Management Pro products. This can lead to unauthorized access and impersonation of legitimate users, potentially compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the management system. However, device-level security features remain intact, limiting the scope of impact to the management system's remote connection interface.

CWE-305Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A07:2025: Authentication Failures (opens in a new tab)
The authentication algorithm is sound, but the implemented mechanism can be bypassed as the result of a separate weakness that is primary to the authentication error.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V2.8.5 (opens in a new tab)
V2.8.4 (opens in a new tab)
V9.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-609469.html (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 14 Apr 2026, 09:16 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-305

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats