VulnerabilityPublished 6 Apr 2026Updated 26 Jun 2026

CVE-2026-37977: Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 · Origin Validation Error

Affects Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4Source CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 3.7 Low.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 11:52 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

3.7Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 16% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected. For example, a successful attack may require an attacker to: gather knowledge about the environment in which the vulnerable target/component exists; prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability; or inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim in order to read and/or modify network communications (e.g., a man in the middle attack).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 6 Apr 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6	Affected–	Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3	Affected–	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

The vendor advisory does not explicitly state a patch or official fix for this vulnerability. However, updated Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3 images are available that address multiple security issues including this one. Users should upgrade to Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3 or later to obtain these fixes. Additionally, clients should avoid misconfiguration by not setting webOrigins to ['*'], thereby reducing exposure to this vulnerability. Back up existing installations before applying updates. Monitor the vendor advisory for any future updates or patches specific to this issue.

Description

A flaw was found in Keycloak. A remote attacker can exploit a Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) header injection vulnerability in Keycloak's User-Managed Access (UMA) token endpoint. This flaw occurs because the `azp` claim from a client-supplied JSON Web Token (JWT) is used to set the `Access-Control-Allow-Origin` header before the JWT signature is validated. When a specially crafted JWT with an attacker-controlled `azp` value is processed, this value is reflected as the CORS origin, even if the grant is later rejected. This can lead to the exposure of low-sensitivity information from authorization server error responses, weakening origin isolation, but only when a target client is misconfigured with `webOrigins: ["*"]`.

Impact

The impact is limited to potential exposure of low-sensitivity information from authorization server error responses due to weakened origin isolation caused by CORS header injection. There is no impact on integrity or availability. Exploitation requires a misconfigured client with webOrigins set to ['*'], which is not a default or recommended configuration. The CVSS vector indicates network attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and only confidentiality impact (low).

Summary

This vulnerability in Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 allows a remote attacker to inject a malicious origin into the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header via the 'azp' claim in a JWT before signature validation. Because the origin is reflected even if the JWT grant is later rejected, it can weaken origin isolation and lead to exposure of low-sensitivity information from error responses. The issue requires a misconfiguration where the client has webOrigins set to ['*']. The CVSS score is 3.7 (low severity). The vendor advisory indicates no explicit patch or fix currently available for this specific issue but references updated Keycloak 26.6.3 images addressing multiple vulnerabilities including this one. However, no direct fix for this CVE is explicitly stated in the advisory, and the remediation level is not provided. The vulnerability is not in a cloud service, and no known exploits are reported in the wild.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 16 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats