CVE-2026-39821: CWE-1289: Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input in golang.org/x/net golang.org/x/net/idna
The ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly accept Punycode-encoded labels that decode to an ASCII-only label. For example, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") incorrectly returns the name "example.com" rather than an error. This behavior can lead to privilege escalation in programs using the idna package. For example, a program which performs privilege checks on the ASCII hostname may reject "example.com" but permit "xn--example-.com". If that program subsequently converts the ASCII hostname to Unicode, it will inadvertently permits access to the Unicode name "example.com".
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The golang.org/x/net/idna package's ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly handle Punycode-encoded labels that decode to ASCII-only labels. Specifically, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") returns "example.com" instead of an error, which can cause programs relying on ASCII hostname checks to mistakenly permit access. This improper validation of equivalence in input can lead to privilege escalation in applications using this package for hostname processing.
Potential Impact
This vulnerability can lead to privilege escalation in applications that use the idna package for hostname validation and perform access control based on ASCII hostnames. An attacker could exploit this by using specially crafted Punycode labels that bypass ASCII hostname checks but are later converted to allowed Unicode hostnames, thereby gaining unauthorized access.
Mitigation Recommendations
Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until a fix is available, developers should carefully review hostname validation logic when using the golang.org/x/net/idna package and consider additional validation steps to ensure consistent handling of Punycode and Unicode hostnames.
CVE-2026-39821: CWE-1289: Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input in golang.org/x/net golang.org/x/net/idna
Description
The ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly accept Punycode-encoded labels that decode to an ASCII-only label. For example, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") incorrectly returns the name "example.com" rather than an error. This behavior can lead to privilege escalation in programs using the idna package. For example, a program which performs privilege checks on the ASCII hostname may reject "example.com" but permit "xn--example-.com". If that program subsequently converts the ASCII hostname to Unicode, it will inadvertently permits access to the Unicode name "example.com".
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
The golang.org/x/net/idna package's ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly handle Punycode-encoded labels that decode to ASCII-only labels. Specifically, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") returns "example.com" instead of an error, which can cause programs relying on ASCII hostname checks to mistakenly permit access. This improper validation of equivalence in input can lead to privilege escalation in applications using this package for hostname processing.
Potential Impact
This vulnerability can lead to privilege escalation in applications that use the idna package for hostname validation and perform access control based on ASCII hostnames. An attacker could exploit this by using specially crafted Punycode labels that bypass ASCII hostname checks but are later converted to allowed Unicode hostnames, thereby gaining unauthorized access.
Mitigation Recommendations
Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until a fix is available, developers should carefully review hostname validation logic when using the golang.org/x/net/idna package and consider additional validation steps to ensure consistent handling of Punycode and Unicode hostnames.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Go
- Date Reserved
- 2026-04-07T18:13:03.526Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
- Remediation Level
- null
Threat ID: 6a1079f0e1370fbb48159db0
Added to database: 5/22/2026, 3:44:48 PM
Last enriched: 5/22/2026, 4:00:45 PM
Last updated: 5/23/2026, 7:01:06 PM
Views: 9
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.