Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-44126: SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway · Deserialization of Untrusted Data

Affects SEPPmail Secure Email GatewaySource CVE Database V5

0
Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.2 Critical : upgrade to 15.0.4 as a priority.

Data as of 6 Nov 2026, 23:24 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
9.2Critical
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Contested

Critical score, yet low EPSS after six months
EPSS
0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 41% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in 15.0.4
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 8 May 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 6 Nov 2026.

What to do

Upgrade SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway to 15.0.4.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
SEPPmail AGSecure Email GatewayAffected
  • <15.0.4
Fixed in
  • 15.0.4

AI-suggested

If you cannot patch yet, restrict access to the new GINA UI interface if possible and monitor for suspicious activity related to deserialization attempts. Avoid exposing the vulnerable service to untrusted networks.

Description

SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.4 insecurely deserializes untrusted data, which can be reached from the new GINA UI and may allow unauthenticated remote attackers to execute code via a crafted serialized object.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…