VulnerabilityPublished 26 Jun 2026Updated 6 Jul 2026

CVE-2026-53310: Linux kernel · soc/tegra: cbb: Fix cross-fabric target timeout lookup

Source GCVE Database

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.5 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 5% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 26 Jun 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

ghsa-fpxp-9g9j-vhm7

What to do

AI-suggested

The description indicates that a fix has been implemented in the Linux kernel source code by correcting the fabric lookup logic. Users should monitor official Linux kernel releases and apply updates that include this fix once available.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: soc/tegra: cbb: Fix cross-fabric target timeout lookup When a fabric receives an error interrupt, the error may have occurred on a different fabric. The target timeout lookup was using the wrong base address (cbb->regs) with offsets from a different fabric's target map, causing a kernel page fault. Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff80000954cc00 pc : tegra234_cbb_get_tmo_slv+0xc/0x28 Call trace: tegra234_cbb_get_tmo_slv+0xc/0x28 print_err_notifier+0x6c0/0x7d0 tegra234_cbb_isr+0xe4/0x1b4 Add tegra234_cbb_get_fabric() to look up the correct fabric device using fab_id, and use its base address for accessing target timeout registers.

Impact

The vulnerability causes kernel page faults leading to denial of service (system instability or crash) when error interrupts are received and handled incorrectly. There is no indication of confidentiality or integrity impact. The impact is limited to availability disruption due to kernel crashes.

Summary

The Linux kernel vulnerability (CVE-2026-53310) involves the soc/tegra cbb driver where error interrupts from one fabric could cause the kernel to access target timeout registers using the base address of a different fabric. This incorrect lookup caused kernel page faults, as demonstrated by a paging request failure in the tegra234_cbb_get_tmo_slv function. The fix introduced a new function, tegra234_cbb_get_fabric(), to correctly identify the fabric device by fab_id and use the appropriate base address for target timeout register access, preventing the page fault.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…