Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-53345: Linux kernel · Memory Leak

Source GCVE Database

0
Compare
Authoritative record:CVE-2026-53345· Low

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.5 Low · fixed in 8618004d3e897c0f1b71d9a9ab860461289bb89a : update Linux kernel when convenient.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 16:33 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
5.5Low
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Thin evidence

One scorer or none
Patch
Available – fixed in 8618004d3e897c0f1b71d9a9ab860461289bb89a, 343e95c8ecc40e0738975ef4ee24c0c35e800e6b, 99d7d43784ae3235026581e9bf892c036e04c8e6 +3
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 1 Jul 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade to a fixed release listed under Affected software.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 2efd61a608b0039911924d2e5d7028eb37496e85, < 8618004d3e897c0f1b71d9a9ab860461289bb89a
Fixed in
  • 8618004d3e897c0f1b71d9a9ab860461289bb89a
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 2efd61a608b0039911924d2e5d7028eb37496e85, < 343e95c8ecc40e0738975ef4ee24c0c35e800e6b
Fixed in
  • 343e95c8ecc40e0738975ef4ee24c0c35e800e6b
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 2efd61a608b0039911924d2e5d7028eb37496e85, < 99d7d43784ae3235026581e9bf892c036e04c8e6
Fixed in
  • 99d7d43784ae3235026581e9bf892c036e04c8e6
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 2efd61a608b0039911924d2e5d7028eb37496e85, < 66a8e7ddd901023c89a2733494d827eca3f9c1b0
Fixed in
  • 66a8e7ddd901023c89a2733494d827eca3f9c1b0
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 2efd61a608b0039911924d2e5d7028eb37496e85, < 033d39e41fc30f484f4e4f37fb4cd76b12cbb18e
Fixed in
  • 033d39e41fc30f484f4e4f37fb4cd76b12cbb18e
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ 2efd61a608b0039911924d2e5d7028eb37496e85, < 21b880f040bd0e8b50ff30c5a40db7bf3384ff48
Fixed in
  • 21b880f040bd0e8b50ff30c5a40db7bf3384ff48

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: Don't WARN if memory is dirtied without a vCPU when the VM is dying When marking a page dirty, complain about not having a running/loaded vCPU if and only if the VM is still alive, i.e. its refcount is non-zero. This will allow fixing a memory leak for x86 SEV-ES guests without hitting what is effectively a false positive on the WARN. For some SEV-ES VM-Exits, KVM keeps a writable mapping of a guest page across an exit to userspace, and typically unmaps the page on the next KVM_RUN. But if userspace never calls KVM_RUN after such an exit, then KVM needs to unmap the page when the vCPU is destroyed, which in turn triggers the WARN about not having a running vCPU. Alternatively, SEV-ES could temporarily load the vCPU to suppress the WARN, as is done in nested_vmx_free_vcpu() (but for completely unrelated reasons; suppressing WARN from nested_put_vmcs12_pages() is pure happenstance). But loading a vCPU during destruction is gross (ideally nVMX code would be cleaned up), risks complicating the SEV-ES code (KVM would need to ensure the temporarily load()+put() only runs when the vCPU isn't already loaded), and is ultimately pointless. The motivation for the WARN is to guard against KVM dirtying guest memory without pushing the corresponding GFN to the active vCPU's dirty ring, e.g. to ensure userspace doesn't miss a dirty page. But for the VM's refcount to reach zero, there can't be _any_ userspace mappings to the dirty ring, as mapping the dirty ring requires doing mmap() on the vCPU FD. I.e. if userspace had a valid mapping for the dirty ring, then the vCPU file and thus the owning VM would still be alive. And so since userspace can't possibly reach the dirty ring, whether or not KVM technically "misses" a push to the dirty ring is irrelevant.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…