Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-53361: Linux kernel · af_unix: Set gc_in_progress to true in unix_gc().

Affects Linux kernelSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.1 High · fixed in d82ba05263c69fa2437fe93e4e561cc40f4c03af : patch Linux kernel soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
7.1High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 7% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CISA SSVC
Exploitation
No evidence of active exploitation and no public proof of concept
Automatable
Attackers cannot reliably automate steps 1–4 of the kill chain
Technical impact
Limited control over the software or limited information exposure

CISA SSVC assessment, 2026-10-16.

Patch
Available – fixed in d82ba05263c69fa2437fe93e4e561cc40f4c03af, 591f1ac217428a6d2b32a8ac14aac0fab44f155a, 82c17e13d404f686e164590483fd6c1abaa675d0 +4
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 4 Jul 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade to a fixed release listed under Affected software.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • >=6.1.141 <6.1.183
  • >=6.6.93 <6.6.144
Fixed in
  • d82ba05263c69fa2437fe93e4e561cc40f4c03af
  • 591f1ac217428a6d2b32a8ac14aac0fab44f155a
  • 82c17e13d404f686e164590483fd6c1abaa675d0
  • 20aa894d475bd8086b25c1113ec4ca70f70c7a98
  • 6.6.144
  • 6.1.183
  • 0cfa78c050662784fc8e3ab26dbfd1dc632b2082
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • =6.9
Fixed in–

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Set gc_in_progress to true in unix_gc(). Igor Ushakov reported that unix_gc() could run with gc_in_progress being false if the work is scheduled while running: Thread 1 Thread 2 Thread 3 -------- -------- -------- unix_schedule_gc() unix_schedule_gc() `- if (!gc_in_progress) `- if (!gc_in_progress) |- gc_in_progress = true | `- queue_work() | unix_gc() <----------------/ | | |- gc_in_progress = true ... `- queue_work() | | `- gc_in_progress = false | | unix_gc() <---------------------------------------------' | ... /* gc_in_progress == false */ | `- gc_in_progress = false unix_peek_fpl() relies on gc_in_progress not to confuse GC by MSG_PEEK. Let's set gc_in_progress to true in unix_gc().

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…