CVE-2026-53538: CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict in Kludex python-multipart
### Summary `QuerystringParser` treated `;` as a field separator in `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` bodies, in addition to `&`. The [WHATWG URL standard](https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#urlencoded-parsing), modern browsers, and Python's `urllib.parse` (since the CVE-2021-23336 fix) treat only `&` as a separator. This creates a parser differential: the same bytes are tokenized into different fields than a WHATWG compliant intermediary would produce, allowing an attacker to smuggle extra form fields past an upstream body inspecting component. ### Details In `python_multipart/multipart.py`, the `FIELD_NAME` and `FIELD_DATA` states located the next separator by scanning for `&` and, failing that, for `;`: ```python sep_pos = data.find(b"&", i) if sep_pos == -1: sep_pos = data.find(b";", i) ``` As a result, `;` acted as a field boundary. Because the fallback only triggered when no `&` remained in the current chunk, tokenization also depended on unrelated bytes later in the buffer and on how the body was split across `write()` calls. This is the same class of issue as CVE-2021-23336 in CPython's `urllib.parse`. For example, a body inspecting WAF or gateway that follows the WHATWG rule (only `&` separates fields) receives: ``` role=user&x=;role=admin ``` The upstream parses two fields, `role=user` and `x=";role=admin"`, sees a benign `role=user`, and forwards the request. `QuerystringParser` parsed the same bytes as three fields: `role="user"`, `x=""`, and `role="admin"`. The application (for example via Starlette/FastAPI `request.form()`, where the last value wins) then received `role=admin`, a value the upstream validator never saw. The parser is reachable through the public `QuerystringParser` class, the high level `FormParser`, `create_form_parser`, and `parse_form` APIs, and Starlette/FastAPI `request.form()` for url encoded bodies. ### Impact Interpretation conflict / HTTP parameter pollution. An attacker can smuggle extra or overriding form fields past an upstream component that applies the WHATWG separator rule, reaching the backend with parameters the intermediary did not observe. ### Mitigation Upgrade to `python-multipart` `0.0.30` or later, which treats only `&` as a field separator per the [WHATWG URL standard](https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#urlencoded-parsing). `;` is parsed as ordinary field data, matching `urllib.parse`, browsers, and other compliant parsers.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The python-multipart library's QuerystringParser prior to version 0.0.30 incorrectly treated the semicolon character as a field separator in application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies, diverging from the WHATWG URL standard and modern browser behavior, which recognize only the ampersand as a separator. This interpretation conflict creates a parser differential that can be exploited to smuggle additional form fields past upstream body inspection components. The issue is addressed and fixed in version 0.0.30 of python-multipart.
Potential Impact
This vulnerability allows an attacker to bypass upstream body inspection by injecting extra form fields that are not recognized by intermediaries following the WHATWG URL standard. While it does not directly compromise confidentiality or availability, it can lead to integrity issues by enabling unauthorized data injection into form submissions.
Mitigation Recommendations
Upgrade python-multipart to version 0.0.30 or later, where this vulnerability is fixed. No other mitigation is required as the fix is available and addresses the issue directly.
CVE-2026-53538: CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict in Kludex python-multipart
Description
### Summary `QuerystringParser` treated `;` as a field separator in `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` bodies, in addition to `&`. The [WHATWG URL standard](https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#urlencoded-parsing), modern browsers, and Python's `urllib.parse` (since the CVE-2021-23336 fix) treat only `&` as a separator. This creates a parser differential: the same bytes are tokenized into different fields than a WHATWG compliant intermediary would produce, allowing an attacker to smuggle extra form fields past an upstream body inspecting component. ### Details In `python_multipart/multipart.py`, the `FIELD_NAME` and `FIELD_DATA` states located the next separator by scanning for `&` and, failing that, for `;`: ```python sep_pos = data.find(b"&", i) if sep_pos == -1: sep_pos = data.find(b";", i) ``` As a result, `;` acted as a field boundary. Because the fallback only triggered when no `&` remained in the current chunk, tokenization also depended on unrelated bytes later in the buffer and on how the body was split across `write()` calls. This is the same class of issue as CVE-2021-23336 in CPython's `urllib.parse`. For example, a body inspecting WAF or gateway that follows the WHATWG rule (only `&` separates fields) receives: ``` role=user&x=;role=admin ``` The upstream parses two fields, `role=user` and `x=";role=admin"`, sees a benign `role=user`, and forwards the request. `QuerystringParser` parsed the same bytes as three fields: `role="user"`, `x=""`, and `role="admin"`. The application (for example via Starlette/FastAPI `request.form()`, where the last value wins) then received `role=admin`, a value the upstream validator never saw. The parser is reachable through the public `QuerystringParser` class, the high level `FormParser`, `create_form_parser`, and `parse_form` APIs, and Starlette/FastAPI `request.form()` for url encoded bodies. ### Impact Interpretation conflict / HTTP parameter pollution. An attacker can smuggle extra or overriding form fields past an upstream component that applies the WHATWG separator rule, reaching the backend with parameters the intermediary did not observe. ### Mitigation Upgrade to `python-multipart` `0.0.30` or later, which treats only `&` as a field separator per the [WHATWG URL standard](https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#urlencoded-parsing). `;` is parsed as ordinary field data, matching `urllib.parse`, browsers, and other compliant parsers.
CVSS v3.1
Score 3.7low
Affected software
Kludex
python-multipart
Run on your own infrastructure? Check whether these packages are installed with threat-finder — our free open-source scanner.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
The python-multipart library's QuerystringParser prior to version 0.0.30 incorrectly treated the semicolon character as a field separator in application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies, diverging from the WHATWG URL standard and modern browser behavior, which recognize only the ampersand as a separator. This interpretation conflict creates a parser differential that can be exploited to smuggle additional form fields past upstream body inspection components. The issue is addressed and fixed in version 0.0.30 of python-multipart.
Potential Impact
This vulnerability allows an attacker to bypass upstream body inspection by injecting extra form fields that are not recognized by intermediaries following the WHATWG URL standard. While it does not directly compromise confidentiality or availability, it can lead to integrity issues by enabling unauthorized data injection into form submissions.
Mitigation Recommendations
Upgrade python-multipart to version 0.0.30 or later, where this vulnerability is fixed. No other mitigation is required as the fix is available and addresses the issue directly.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2026-06-09T18:13:07.263Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6a39735aeed863c81e396230
Added to database: 06/22/2026, 17:39:38 UTC
Last enriched: 06/29/2026, 21:51:01 UTC
Last updated: 09/21/2026, 22:01:35 UTC
Views: 140
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.