VulnerabilityPublished 2 Jul 2026Updated 8 Nov 2026

CVE-2026-59101: EstrellaXD Auto_Bangumi · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Affects EstrellaXD Auto_BangumiSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.8 Medium : upgrade to 3.2.8 when convenient.

Data as of 14 Nov 2026, 20:58 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.8Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Thin evidence

One scorer or none

CVSS scores by source
CNA (VulnCheck)	CVSS 3.1	5.8
CNA (VulnCheck)	CVSS 4.0	6.9

EPSS: 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 43% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 3.2.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 2 Jul 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 14 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

cwe-918

What to do

Upgrade EstrellaXD Auto_Bangumi to 3.2.8.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
EstrellaXDAuto_Bangumi	Affected <3.2.8	Fixed in 3.2.8
GitHubAuto_Bangumi`pkg:github/Auto_Bangumi`Other threats	Affected <3.2.8	Fixed in 3.2.8

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

If you cannot patch yet, restrict access to the initial setup endpoint and limit exposure of the server to untrusted networks during the setup window to reduce risk.

Description

AutoBangumi before 3.2.8 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to probe internal network services by supplying arbitrary host values to an unprotected setup endpoint. Attackers can send requests to the POST /api/v1/setup/test-downloader endpoint during the initial setup window, causing the server to issue HTTP GET requests to internal or reserved addresses and leak information through echoed connection-error messages.

Impact

Exploitation of this SSRF vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote attackers to probe internal network services behind the server by inducing it to make HTTP requests to arbitrary internal or reserved IP addresses. This can lead to information disclosure via connection-error messages. The vulnerability does not directly impact integrity or availability but can reveal sensitive internal network details to attackers.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 17 Jul 2026, 09:08 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats