Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-71966: usmannasir cyberpanel · OS Command Injection

Affects usmannasir cyberpanelSource CVE Database V5

0
Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.7 High.

Data as of 7 Nov 2026, 23:24 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
8.7High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
3.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 88% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 10 Aug 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 8 Nov 2026.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
usmannasircyberpanelAffected
  • <=2.4.3
Fixed in–
GitHubcyberpanelpkg:github/cyberpanelOther threatsAffected
  • <=2.4.3
Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

A fix for this vulnerability is available as indicated by the referenced commit (eca0c3c). Users should upgrade CyberPanel to a version later than 2.4.3 where this issue is resolved. Until patched, restrict access to the remote backup transfer feature to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious activity related to command execution.

Description

CyberPanel 2.4.3, fixed in commit eca0c3c, contains an authenticated command injection vulnerability in the remote backup transfer feature that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by controlling a remote server's API response. Attackers can inject malicious commands through a crafted directory name in the remote server's API response, which bypasses security middleware validation and is passed unsanitized to the OS command execution function.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…