Skip to main content
EPSS 0.5%top 57%

CVE-2026-73812: CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in Erlang OTP

0
High
Published: 09/01/2026 (09/01/2026, 15:17:00 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: Erlang
Product: OTP

Description

CVE-2026-73812 is a high-severity vulnerability in Erlang OTP's HTTP server (httpd) involving inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests, specifically HTTP request/response smuggling. The vulnerability occurs because the httpd function check_header/3 rejects duplicate Content-Length headers but does not check for the simultaneous presence of Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length headers, which RFC 9112 §6.3 identifies as a probable smuggling attempt. This can lead to desynchronization between front-end and back-end HTTP processing when a Content-Length-preferring front-end is paired with a chunked-preferring back-end. Multiple OTP and inets versions are affected. No explicit patch information is provided.

CVSS v4.0

Score 8.3high

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vuln. Confidentiality
Low
Vuln. Integrity
High
Vuln. Availability
None
Subsq. Confidentiality
None
Subsq. Integrity
None
Subsq. Availability
None
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Affected software

Erlang

OTP

Affected versions
>=17.0 <27.3.4.17>=28.0 <28.5.0.6>=29.0 <29.0.6

Erlang

OTP

Affected versions
>=5.10 <9.3.2.7>=9.4 <9.6.2.3>=9.7 <9.7.2

Erlang

OTP

GitHub Actionsmore threats →cve
inets
pkg:github/inets
Affected versions
>=5.10 <9.3.2.7>=9.4 <9.6.2.3>=9.7 <9.7.2
GitHub Actionsmore threats →cve
erlang/otp
pkg:github/erlang/otp
CPE configurations
cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Run on your own infrastructure? Check whether these packages are installed with threat-finder — our free open-source scanner.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 09/29/2026, 04:50:28 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-73812 affects Erlang OTP's HTTP server (httpd) and is classified as CWE-444 (Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests). The vulnerability arises because the check_header/3 function rejects duplicate Content-Length headers but fails to detect the coexistence of Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length headers in the same request. According to RFC 9112 §6.3, the presence of both headers is a likely indicator of HTTP request smuggling attempts. This flaw can cause desynchronization between front-end and back-end HTTP processing components, particularly when the front-end prefers Content-Length and the back-end prefers chunked Transfer-Encoding. The vulnerability impacts multiple Erlang OTP and inets versions as specified, with a CVSS 4.0 score of 8.3 indicating high severity. No vendor advisory or patch links are provided in the data.

Potential Impact

The vulnerability can lead to HTTP request/response smuggling attacks due to inconsistent interpretation of HTTP headers by the Erlang OTP HTTP server. This may cause desynchronization between front-end and back-end HTTP processing, potentially allowing attackers to bypass security controls or interfere with HTTP traffic handling. The CVSS score of 8.3 reflects a high severity impact with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, low confidentiality impact, high integrity impact, and no availability impact.

Mitigation Recommendations

Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until an official fix is available, users should monitor Erlang OTP advisories for updates. No specific mitigations or temporary fixes are provided in the available data.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
EEF
Date Reserved
2026-08-17T11:00:01.498Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6a96e6ecacd9273b49d7168a

Added to database: 09/01/2026, 14:53:32 UTC

Last enriched: 09/29/2026, 04:50:28 UTC

Last updated: 10/16/2026, 06:48:19 UTC

Views: 101

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses