Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-74653: Linux kernel · serial: 8250_of: clear stuck empty-FIFO RX-timeout on LPC32xx

Affects Linux kernelSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · fixed in cc325ce1c40a111824827532ac132afb3d1c342b : update Linux kernel when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:30 UTC

Severity
Unrated

Rated by Threat Radar · CVSS not yet scored by NVD

EPSS
0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 6% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in cc325ce1c40a111824827532ac132afb3d1c342b, c321dc5172c8c66e21ffbeeb7a2ebb88ae6fd4c3, 1423415471274abda87024967d7fe2206ceee0ea +2

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 22 Aug 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade to a fixed release listed under Affected software.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7, < cc325ce1c40a111824827532ac132afb3d1c342b
Fixed in
  • cc325ce1c40a111824827532ac132afb3d1c342b
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7, < c321dc5172c8c66e21ffbeeb7a2ebb88ae6fd4c3
Fixed in
  • c321dc5172c8c66e21ffbeeb7a2ebb88ae6fd4c3
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7, < 1423415471274abda87024967d7fe2206ceee0ea
Fixed in
  • 1423415471274abda87024967d7fe2206ceee0ea
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7, < 7795e8abedc86438cae0454602cbf9038b94bf38
Fixed in
  • 7795e8abedc86438cae0454602cbf9038b94bf38
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ e6e912c4964ce5976e508881207dfa96d5f856d7, < 3ce24bc4d115336218e59b7e286fd3a79f4fc4c6
Fixed in
  • 3ce24bc4d115336218e59b7e286fd3a79f4fc4c6
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • =2.6.36
Fixed in–

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: serial: 8250_of: clear stuck empty-FIFO RX-timeout on LPC32xx The NXP LPC32xx UART (PORT_LPC3220) can latch an RX character-timeout interrupt while the RX FIFO is empty: IIR reports UART_IIR_RX_TIMEOUT (0x0c) but LSR.DR is clear. A character timeout is only cleared by reading RHR, but serial8250_rx_chars() reads RHR only when LSR.DR is set, so nothing ever clears the condition. The interrupt is level-triggered and re-fires immediately, so on a single-core ARM926 the resulting interrupt storm livelocks the CPU. It is reproducible when userspace repeatedly opens the front-panel port (ttyS1): serial8250_do_set_termios() re-enables interrupts on unlock and the handler then spins forever with iir=0xcc lsr=0x60 ier=0x05, tripping the soft-lockup detector in serial8250_handle_irq_locked(). LPC32xx has no dedicated 8250 glue driver, it's driven by the generic 8250_of. Add a hardware specific handle_irq for PORT_LPC3220, wired up in of_platform_serial_setup() the same way fsl8250_handle_irq is installed. The handler follows dw8250_handle_irq(): on an RX timeout with an empty FIFO (LSR.DR and LSR.BI clear) it does one throwaway RHR read to clear the condition, then calls serial8250_handle_irq_locked(). No real received data is ever discarded, and it is a no-op on healthy UARTs which never report a timeout with DR clear. This is the same class of bug already worked around in other 8250 drivers; see commit 424d79183af0 ("serial: 8250_dw: Avoid "too much work" from bogus rx timeout interrupt") which reports the identical iir=0xcc/lsr=0x60. See also UART_RX_TIMEOUT_QUIRK in 8250_omap, and the note in 8250_bcm7271.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…