Skip to main content
CVE-2026-76059VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-76059: IBM Langflow OSS · Protection Mechanism Failure

Affects IBM Langflow OSSSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.8 High.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
8.8High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 51% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 10 Sep 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
IBMLangflow OSSAffected
  • >=1.0.0 <=1.11.5
Fixed in–

CPE configurations (2)

  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.11.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

Until an official fix is available, restrict the ability to submit custom component source code to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious activity related to component submissions.

Description

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 An attacker who could submit custom component source code could bypass the static security scanner by crafting an annotated class-body assignment that resolved to a dangerous callable through alias tracking; the resolved value was never checked against the dangerous callable blocklist due to the logic error. If the crafted component reached the runtime execution path, the attacker could cause arbitrary operating system commands to execute on the server in-process, with the privileges of the running service.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…