CVE-2026-82752: CWE-1284 Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ash-project ash
Description
CVE-2026-82752 is a medium severity vulnerability in the ash-project ash framework affecting versions from 0.10.0 up to but not including 3.33.0. It involves improper validation of specified quantity in input, where string length constraints are measured by Unicode graphemes rather than codepoints. This discrepancy allows an attacker to store arbitrarily large values in attributes despite small maximum length constraints, potentially leading to unbounded storage growth. The mismatch between validation and storage length counting can also cause data truncation or rejection at the database layer.
CVSS v4.0
Score 5.9medium
Affected software
ash-project
ash
ash-project
ash
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*Run on your own infrastructure? Check whether these packages are installed with threat-finder — our free open-source scanner.
Weaknesses
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
The vulnerability arises because ash-project ash uses Elixir's String.length/1 function, which counts Unicode graphemes, to enforce max_length and min_length constraints on string attributes. A grapheme can include a base character plus many combining marks, allowing a single grapheme to represent megabytes of data. Since the data storage layers (ETS, Mnesia, Postgres text columns) count codepoints rather than graphemes, an attacker can bypass length constraints by submitting strings with many combining marks, causing the system to store much larger data than intended. This leads to improper validation of input size and potential resource exhaustion or data integrity issues. The issue affects all versions from 0.10.0 before 3.33.0.
Potential Impact
An attacker can bypass string length constraints by exploiting the difference between grapheme-based length validation and codepoint-based storage limits. This can result in storing arbitrarily large data in attributes that are supposed to have small maximum lengths, potentially causing unbounded growth in storage usage. Additionally, the mismatch can cause data truncation or rejection at the database layer, possibly leading to application errors or data loss. There is no indication of remote exploitability without local access (attack vector is local).
Mitigation Recommendations
Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Since no patch or official fix is provided in the input data, users should monitor the vendor's advisories for updates. Until a fix is available, consider implementing additional input validation at the application or database layer to limit input size by codepoints rather than graphemes, or restrict the use of combining marks in input strings.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- EEF
- Date Reserved
- 2026-08-31T01:00:10.817Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6a9c4febacd9273b492b169a
Added to database: 09/05/2026, 17:22:51 UTC
Last enriched: 09/15/2026, 00:49:54 UTC
Last updated: 10/20/2026, 18:48:24 UTC
Views: 96
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.