Skip to main content

CVE-2026-88831: Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') in Red Hat Red Hat Hardened Images

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-88831cvecve-2026-88831
Published: 09/23/2026 (09/23/2026, 17:45:23 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: Red Hat
Product: Red Hat Hardened Images

Description

BusyBox httpd IP deny rules with invalid CIDR prefix lengths fail open, leaving a parsed IP with a zeroed mask so the rule matches no clients.

CVSS v3.1

Score 5.3medium

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Affected software

Red Hat

Red Hat Hardened Images

AI-Powered Analysis

Machine-generated threat intelligence

AILast updated: 09/23/2026, 18:03:23 UTC

Technical Analysis

This vulnerability arises because BusyBox httpd does not fail securely when IP deny rules contain invalid CIDR prefix lengths. Instead of blocking access, the server parses the IP with a zeroed mask, effectively matching no clients and allowing unintended access. This is a failure to enforce intended access restrictions, categorized under CWE-636 (Not Failing Securely). The issue requires a misconfiguration in the httpd configuration file and is specific to BusyBox httpd as shipped in Red Hat Hardened Images. Red Hat advises auditing all BusyBox httpd configuration files for valid CIDR prefix lengths and recommends using network-level access controls as the primary enforcement mechanism.

Potential Impact

The vulnerability allows bypassing of intended IP-based access restrictions in BusyBox httpd, potentially permitting unauthorized network clients to access protected content. There is no impact on integrity or availability, and no privileges or user interaction are required for exploitation. The overall confidentiality impact is low.

Mitigation Recommendations

Red Hat advises auditing all BusyBox httpd configuration files to ensure CIDR prefix lengths are syntactically valid. Additionally, network-level access controls such as iptables or nftables should be implemented as the primary enforcement layer rather than relying solely on application-level ACLs. No official fix or patch status is provided in the advisory; therefore, patch status is not yet confirmed—check the Red Hat advisory for updates.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
redhat
Date Reserved
2026-09-10T09:42:04.559Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED
Vendor Advisory Urls
[{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88831","vendor":"Red Hat"}]

Threat ID: 6ab410edf7a7c541061ebb07

Added to database: 09/23/2026, 17:48:29 UTC

Last enriched: 09/23/2026, 18:03:23 UTC

Last updated: 09/24/2026, 01:57:04 UTC

Views: 9

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses