CVE-2026-89248: WWBN AVideo · Information Exposure
Affects WWBN AVideoSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.
Data as of 27 Oct 2026, 05:11 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 42% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Sep 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.
What to do
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| WWBNAVideo | Affected
| Fixed in– |
AI-suggested
Users should monitor the vendor's advisories for updates. Until a fix is released, restricting access to the WebRTC plugin endpoint via network controls or web server configuration may reduce exposure.
Description
AVideo through commit c3edcc274c389816d434acadac07ee78eaf330c1 is missing an authentication/authorization check in plugin/WebRTC/status.json.php. When the WebRTC plugin is present, any unauthenticated remote user can request /plugin/WebRTC/status.json.php and receive JSON containing the absolute filesystem path of the WebRTC2RTMP helper binary (revealing the document-root path), the configured WebRTC port, file_exists/is_executable status for the binary, the contents of the WebRTC log/JSON files (videos/WebRTC2RTMP.log) when present, and whether the configured port is reachable on loopback (127.0.0.1) and on the public address. The endpoint performs no User::isLogged(), User::isAdmin(), or forbiddenPage() check. The issue was unfixed at the time of reporting.