Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-90138: Linux kernel · vsock: don't check the listener's sk_err in vsock_accept()

Affects Linux kernelSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · fixed in c5a75d37c21e558cc6fad1597e732ead30745eed : update Linux kernel when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 13:47 UTC

Severity
Unrated

Rated by Threat Radar · CVSS not yet scored by NVD

EPSS
0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 10% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in c5a75d37c21e558cc6fad1597e732ead30745eed, b8c899cf5e7be29840a172c183dedd8d3e7a0287, 64348c55dd7596ca2c033dcd102af44bdd7e8acd +2

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 17 Sep 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade to a fixed release listed under Affected software.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ d021c344051af91f42c5ba9fdedc176740cbd238, < c5a75d37c21e558cc6fad1597e732ead30745eed
Fixed in
  • c5a75d37c21e558cc6fad1597e732ead30745eed
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ d021c344051af91f42c5ba9fdedc176740cbd238, < b8c899cf5e7be29840a172c183dedd8d3e7a0287
Fixed in
  • b8c899cf5e7be29840a172c183dedd8d3e7a0287
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ d021c344051af91f42c5ba9fdedc176740cbd238, < 64348c55dd7596ca2c033dcd102af44bdd7e8acd
Fixed in
  • 64348c55dd7596ca2c033dcd102af44bdd7e8acd
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ d021c344051af91f42c5ba9fdedc176740cbd238, < 491b368a0c6e5f28b615a50b0d384f5c25fde2a7
Fixed in
  • 491b368a0c6e5f28b615a50b0d384f5c25fde2a7
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • ≥ d021c344051af91f42c5ba9fdedc176740cbd238, < 36e5fa009f98a4edbe1783ac11c0df672b224742
Fixed in
  • 36e5fa009f98a4edbe1783ac11c0df672b224742
LinuxLinuxAffected
  • =3.9
Fixed in–

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock: don't check the listener's sk_err in vsock_accept() Syzbot reported an issue which can be reproduced with these steps: r0 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0) bind(r0, {VMADDR_CID_ANY, PORT}) connect(r0, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -> -1, EPROTO (self-connect) listen(r0, backlog) -> 0 r1 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0) connect(r1, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -> 0 accept(r0) -> -1, EPROTO (stale sk_err) Basically, it creates a socket (r0) and triggers a self-connect after binding it. This self-connect fails with EPROTO because it loops back to r0 while the socket is still in the TCP_SYN_SENT state, causing it to be incorrectly dispatched to the connecting-client path. The unexpected packet type encountered there sets sk_err to EPROTO. After that, it invokes a listen() call on the same socket. This listen() call succeeds because the kernel's listening path never inspects or clears sk_err. Then, a new socket (r1) is created as a normal client and connects to r0. However, vsock_accept() rejects this incoming connection because the listener's sk_err still holds the EPROTO error from the earlier failed self-connect. This rejection causes the child socket created for r1's connection to never be freed on virtio or hyperv transports; only the VMCI transport implements pending_work to revisit and clean up a rejected socket. For a non-blocking connect(), vsock_connect() may return -EINPROGRESS immediately, and vsock_connect_timeout() can later set sk->sk_err asynchronously. Since no vsock transport ever sets sk_err on a socket while it is in TCP_LISTEN state, checking it in vsock_accept() serves no purpose and only carries forward errors left behind by earlier, unrelated connection attempts on the same socket. Remove the checks so accept() no longer rejects valid incoming connections because of a stale error, which also avoids the resource leak described above.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…