Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-90647: Kalkitech ASE2000 V2 Communication Test Set · Improper Certificate Validation

Affects Kalkitech ASE2000 V2 Communication Test SetSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.1 Critical : upgrade to 2.38 as a priority.

Data as of 28 Oct 2026, 05:12 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
9.1Critical
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 11% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in 2.38
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 12 Sep 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade Kalkitech ASE2000 V2 Communication Test Set to 2.38.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
KalkitechASE2000 V2 Communication Test SetAffected
  • >=2.35 <2.38
Fixed in
  • 2.38

AI-suggested

If you cannot patch yet, users should consider network-level mitigations such as restricting access to trusted networks or using additional layers of encryption or authentication where possible.

Description

ASE/Kalkitech ASE2000 V2 Communication Test Set 2.35 through 2.37 on Windows contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability in the IEC 60870-5-104 TLS client (Task Mode). This allows a network-positioned attacker to bypass certificate validation via a certificate with multiple simultaneous faults, enabling a Man-in-the-Middle attack on protected communications.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…