VulnerabilityPublished 15 Sep 2026Updated 17 Sep 2026

CVE-2026-92184: ag-ui · Server-Side Request Forgery

Affects ag-uiSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium · patch available : update ag-ui when convenient.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 20:25 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 31% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 15 Sep 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

ghsa-3863-8rfp-v9rw

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
ag-ui-protocolag-ui	Affected =0.3.0	Fixed in–
GitHubag-ui-protocol/ag-ui`pkg:github/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui`Other threats	Affected =0.3.0	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:ag-ui-protocol:ag-ui:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

A patch is available for this vulnerability, identified by commit bf0c34df34cbb4b1992bc37c9bfffe6dd54bb189. It is recommended to apply this patch promptly to remediate the issue. Since this is a cloud service, the vendor typically manages remediation server-side; verify with the vendor advisory for confirmation. No additional mitigation steps are specified.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in ag-ui-protocol ag-ui 0.3.0. Affected is the function urllib.request.urlopen of the file integrations/aws-strands/python/src/ag_ui_strands/utils.py of the component Multimodal Content. The manipulation of the argument Value results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The patch is identified as bf0c34df34cbb4b1992bc37c9bfffe6dd54bb189. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Impact

Successful exploitation of this SSRF vulnerability could allow an attacker to make arbitrary requests from the vulnerable server, potentially accessing internal resources or services not otherwise accessible. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 5.3 (medium severity), reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, and limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts.

Summary

The vulnerability CVE-2026-92184 affects ag-ui-protocol ag-ui version 0.3.0 in the Multimodal Content component. It arises from improper handling of the argument 'Value' passed to urllib.request.urlopen in the specified Python source file, enabling server-side request forgery. This can be exploited remotely without user interaction and requires low privileges. The issue has been addressed by a patch identified by commit bf0c34df34cbb4b1992bc37c9bfffe6dd54bb189.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…