VulnerabilityPublished 17 Sep 2026Updated 22 Sep 2026

CVE-2026-92993: Dromara mayfly-go · OS Command Injection

Affects Dromara mayfly-goSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 1 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 1.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 73% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Sep 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 1 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Dromaramayfly-go	Affected 1.11.0 – 1.11.5 6 affected builds	Fixed in–
Gogithub.com/dromara/mayfly-go`pkg:golang/github.com/dromara/mayfly-go`Other threats	Affected 1.11.0 – 1.11.5 6 affected builds	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:dromara:mayfly-go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Users should restrict the machine:script:run permission and tag access to trusted accounts only. Avoid using machine templates with untrusted input in {{.param}} placeholders. Monitor for suspicious activity related to script execution. Check the vendor advisory regularly for updates or official fixes.

Description

A vulnerability was detected in Dromara mayfly-go up to 1.11.5. The impacted element is the function RunMachineScript of the file server/internal/machine/api/machine_script.go of the component Machine Script Feature. The manipulation of the argument params results in os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Exploitation needs no admin account. Any account holding machine:script:run plus tag access reaches arbitrary command execution on machines whose templates contain {{.param}} placeholders; the SSH exec layer (Cli.Run) also applies no input filtering to any caller. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows an attacker with limited privileges (machine:script:run plus tag access) to execute arbitrary OS commands remotely on affected machines. This can lead to unauthorized command execution, potentially compromising the targeted systems. No administrative privileges or user interaction are required. The vulnerability affects the integrity and confidentiality of the affected systems.

Summary

This vulnerability exists in the RunMachineScript function of the server/internal/machine/api/machine_script.go file in Dromara mayfly-go up to version 1.11.5. The issue is caused by manipulation of the argument params, leading to OS command injection. Attackers with the machine:script:run permission and tag access can remotely execute arbitrary commands on machines whose templates use {{.param}} placeholders. The SSH exec layer (Cli.Run) does not apply input filtering, facilitating exploitation. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 5.3, indicating medium severity.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…