CVE-2026-95691: OpenSSL · Use After Free
Affects OpenSSLSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · fixed in 4.1.1 : update OpenSSL when convenient.
Data as of 10 Nov 2026, 18:35 UTC
Rated by Threat Radar · CVSS not yet scored by NVD
Thin evidence
One scorer or none- Patch
- Available – fixed in 4.1.1, 4.0.4, 3.5.10
Exploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Nov 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 10 Nov 2026.
What to do
Upgrade OpenSSL to 4.1.1, 4.0.4 or 3.5.10.
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| OpenSSLOpenSSL | Affected
| Fixed in
|
| OpenSSLOpenSSL | Affected
| Fixed in
|
| OpenSSLOpenSSL | Affected
| Fixed in
|
Description
Issue summary: A retransmitted QUIC CRYPTO frame can release packet storage while the TLS record layer retains a direct pointer into that storage causing use after free. Impact summary: A malicious QUIC server can cause a heap-use-after-free read in the OpenSSL QUIC client. The server can also identify one allocator-adjacent byte through the client's protected Handshake response. CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free Description: During CRYPTO stream processing, a pointer into the first frame's memory on the stream is lent to the TLS handshake processing. The memory must remain stable until it is processed and released. However the processing of retransmitted CRYPTO frames could release the memory if the retransmitted frame fully overlapped the existing frame. This then causes use-after-free read when the TLS handshake processing continues. The use-after-free read can lead to a Denial-of-Service of the client application or a minor leak of information about the heap memory contents that might be overwritten with other data, subsequently allocated by the application, to the peer. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
References
- openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20261110.txt (opens in a new tab)
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/dd90ceb99a3c2ddba336bb4a00be9ebabd84c2a1 (opens in a new tab)
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ec9d4de9d03989b29db5a3d7efdb4c285deaf386 (opens in a new tab)
- github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f6244675833e097c2429a40d1b206d95385bd42f (opens in a new tab)