VulnerabilityPublished 29 Sep 2026Updated 1 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-97395: Apache Polaris · Missing Authorization

Affects Apache PolarisSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.1 High : upgrade to 1.8.0 soon.

Data as of 12 Nov 2026, 23:25 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.1High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 20% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 1.8.0

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Sep 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 13 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

ghsa-848v-j2j6-p92w

What to do

Upgrade Apache Polaris and org.apache.polaris/polaris to 1.8.0.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Apache Software FoundationApache Polaris	Affected <1.8.0	Fixed in 1.8.0
Mavenorg.apache.polaris/polaris`pkg:maven/org.apache.polaris/polaris`Other threats	Affected <1.8.0	Fixed in 1.8.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

A patch is available for Apache Polaris to address this vulnerability. Since Apache Polaris is a cloud service, the vendor manages remediation for this server-side service. Users should verify with the vendor advisory that their deployment has been updated to version 1.8.0 or later where this issue is fixed. If patching is not immediately possible, ensure that table writers are fully trusted or restrict their permissions to prevent untrusted configuration of storage endpoints.

Description

CVE-2026-97395 is a vulnerability in Apache Polaris versions prior to 1.8.0 that allows an authenticated user with permission to create or update Iceberg table properties to manipulate FileIO client settings such as s3.endpoint in table metadata. This can cause server-side storage requests to be redirected to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exposing authentication credentials. The vulnerability affects deployments where table writers are not trusted to configure storage endpoints. A patch is available, and since Apache Polaris is a cloud service, the vendor manages remediation.

Impact

An attacker with permission to create or update Iceberg table properties can redirect server-side storage traffic to an endpoint of their choosing, potentially exposing sensitive authentication credentials. This can lead to unauthorized access or data exposure related to the storage backend. The vulnerability does not affect availability but has high confidentiality and integrity impacts.

Summary

Apache Polaris versions before 1.8.0 permit an authenticated principal with Iceberg table property modification rights to set FileIO client settings like s3.endpoint in table metadata. When Polaris performs server-side Iceberg operations (e.g., commits, purges), it may use these settings to construct the FileIO client. If the catalog storage configuration does not override the endpoint, Polaris can send storage requests to an endpoint chosen by the table writer, using credentials scoped to the operation. This behavior can redirect server-side storage traffic and expose authentication material to an attacker-controlled host. The vulnerability arises when table writers are not trusted to configure server-side storage endpoints.

CWE-862Missing Authorization (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #4OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Architecture and Design
Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 6 Oct 2026, 20:20 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-862

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats