CVE-2026-119195VulnerabilityPublished 31 Oct 2026

Cve bin tool: pyasn1 has quadratic-time denial of service in constructed string and indefinite-length ANY decoding

Affects cve-bin-toolSource GCVE Database

Compare

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-119195· High 7.5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High.

Data as of 31 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Thin evidence

One scorer or none

CVSS scores by source
CNA (GitHub_M)	CVSS 3.1	7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Homebrewcve-bin-tool`pkg:brew/cve-bin-tool`Other threats	Affected >=3.4	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Until a fix is available, applications should implement input validation and resource limits to mitigate potential CPU exhaustion from crafted ASN.1 inputs. Avoid decoding untrusted ASN.1 data without proper constraints. Monitor vendor channels for updates and patches addressing this issue.

Description

pyasn1 versions 0.6.4 and earlier contain a vulnerability where decoding constructed OCTET STRINGs or character strings composed of many fragments can cause quadratic-time CPU usage due to repeated copying during string reassembly. This also affects indefinite-length ANY decoding. An attacker supplying crafted ASN.1 input to an affected decoder can cause CPU exhaustion, resulting in a denial of service. The issue affects BER and CER decoding paths and certain non-DER constructed strings accepted by the DER decoder with specific schemas. No confidentiality or integrity impact is reported. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 7.5 (high severity).

Impact

An attacker who can supply crafted ASN.1 input to an application using pyasn1 0.6.4 or earlier can cause the decoder to consume excessive CPU resources due to quadratic-time string reassembly in constructed string and indefinite-length ANY decoding paths. This can lead to denial of service by exhausting CPU availability. There is no demonstrated impact on confidentiality or integrity. The severity is high with a CVSS v3.1 score of 7.5, assuming unauthenticated network input is automatically decoded. The vulnerability's exploitability depends on the application context and whether attacker-controlled ASN.1 input is accepted and decoded without adequate input or resource limits.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 31 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats