CVE-2025-13473VulnerabilityPublished 3 Feb 2026Updated 7 May 2026

Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik Debian · Django: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Affects Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik DebianSource GCVE Database

Mentioned vulnerabilities

Authoritative record:CVE-2025-13473· Medium 5.3

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium · fixed in Debian package updates : update Debian django when convenient.

Data as of 27 Oct 2026, 03:00 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Patch: Available – fixed in 6.0.2, 5.2.11, 4.2.28

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected. For example, a successful attack may require an attacker to: gather knowledge about the environment in which the vulnerable target/component exists; prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability; or inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim in order to read and/or modify network communications (e.g., a man in the middle attack).
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

bundesamt-f-r-sicherheit-in-de

What to do

Upgrade Django and django to 6.0.2, 5.2.11 or 4.2.28.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
djangoprojectDjango	Affected >=6.0 <6.0.2	Fixed in 6.0.2
djangoprojectDjango	Affected >=5.2 <5.2.11	Fixed in 5.2.11
djangoprojectDjango	Affected >=4.2 <4.2.28	Fixed in 4.2.28
PyPIdjango`pkg:pypi/django`Other threats	Affected =4.2 =5.2 =6.0	Fixed in–
PyPIdjango`pkg:pypi/django`Other threats	Affected >=6.0 <6.0.2 >=5.2 <5.2.11 >=4.2 <4.2.28	Fixed in 6.0.2 5.2.11 4.2.28

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Red Hat has released updated packages for Ansible Automation Platform 2.5, including patched versions of python3.11-django. Users should apply these official updates promptly. Additionally, users must download and use the latest installer version to ensure successful installation or upgrade. No further action is indicated beyond applying the vendor-provided fixes.

Description

Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in Django, a Python-based server-side web framework. These include SQL injection and denial of service issues via crafted inputs and parameters. The vulnerabilities affect Django versions used within the Python 3.11 environment as packaged for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Red Hat has issued security advisories and updates addressing these issues.

Impact

The vulnerabilities allow for SQL injection attacks, which can lead to unauthorized data access or manipulation, and denial of service conditions that may disrupt service availability. These issues pose a significant risk to applications using affected Django versions within the Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform environment. No known exploits in the wild have been reported at this time.

Summary

The reported security issues concern several vulnerabilities in Django, including SQL injection via crafted column aliases in QuerySet.order_by(), SQL injection via RasterField band index parameter, and denial of service via crafted HTML inputs and duplicate headers. These vulnerabilities are part of a broader set of security fixes in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5, which includes updates to Python 3.11 packages such as django. The advisory references CVEs CVE-2026-1312, CVE-2026-1287, CVE-2026-1285, CVE-2026-1207, and CVE-2025-14550 among others. Red Hat has released updated packages and recommends upgrading to the latest installer version to mitigate these issues.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 27 Oct 2026, 03:00 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats