CVE-2026-114359: Eclipse Kura downloads deployment packages (DPs) from a remote URL without any limit on the size of
Source GCVE Database
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.0 High.
Data as of 10 Nov 2026, 16:36 UTC
Thin evidence
One scorer or none| CNA (eclipse) | CVSS 4.0 | 7.0 |
|---|
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:HExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Nov 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 10 Nov 2026.
What to do
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| Eclipse FoundationEclipse Kura | Affected
| Fixed in– |
GitHubeclipse-kura/kurapkg:github/eclipse-kura/kuraOther threats | Affected
| Fixed in– |
Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.
AI-suggested
Workarounds include installing deployment packages only from trusted HTTPS sources to prevent tampering or malicious large payloads. Additionally, restrict who can install packages by enforcing permissions such as the Web UI 'kura.packages.admin' permission, REST API 'kura.permission.rest.deploy', and cloud DEPLOY-V2 access controls. Monitoring and limiting access to these interfaces reduces the risk of exploitation.
Description
Eclipse Kura has a vulnerability where it downloads deployment packages (DPs) from remote URLs without limiting the size of the data received. This can allow an attacker controlling the server or tampering with HTTP downloads to cause the device to exhaust local storage or memory, leading to denial of service conditions such as failed configuration persistence, failed logging, and potential crashes of the framework or other services. The REST upload endpoint also lacks size limits on uploads. Workarounds include restricting package installation to trusted HTTPS sources and limiting who can install packages via permissions.