GHSA-pqpw-cvm4-8mv9: Avo: Direct attachment upload endpoint lacks upload authorization and bypasses field-level upload policy
Avo's direct attachment upload endpoint lacks proper server-side upload authorization, allowing authenticated users to upload or replace attachments on records even when field-level upload policies deny such actions. This affects multi-role Avo Pro/Advanced deployments where per-record or per-field upload restrictions are expected. The vulnerability arises because the upload endpoint creates and attaches files without enforcing the documented upload authorization methods, unlike the deletion endpoint which correctly enforces authorization. This inconsistency enables bypassing intended upload restrictions via direct POST requests to the upload endpoint.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The vulnerability in Avo affects the direct attachment upload endpoint (POST /avo_api/resources/:resource_name/:id/attachments/) where the server-side code creates and attaches ActiveStorage blobs before validating attachment associations or enforcing upload authorization policies. The controller does not call the expected authorization methods such as upload_<field>? or update? before attaching files, allowing authenticated users with access to the endpoint to bypass field-level upload policies. This contrasts with the attachment deletion endpoint, which properly enforces delete_<attachment_name>? authorization. The issue impacts versions from 2.28.0 up to but not including 3.32.0, including later beta versions, and has been confirmed by proof-of-concept. The vulnerability is documented in Avo's GitHub issues and pull requests, which clarify that upload authorization should be enforced at the field level but currently is not on this endpoint.
Potential Impact
Authenticated users who can access the vulnerable upload endpoint can upload or replace attachments on records regardless of field-level upload policies or update restrictions. This can lead to unauthorized modification of attachment content, including binary data, filenames, and content-type metadata, potentially violating data integrity and access control expectations in multi-role environments. There is no impact on confidentiality or availability indicated, but integrity is affected.
Mitigation Recommendations
Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until an official fix is released, restrict access to the direct attachment upload endpoint to trusted users only and consider implementing additional access controls or request filtering to prevent unauthorized uploads. Monitor Avo's official channels for updates and apply patches promptly once available.
GHSA-pqpw-cvm4-8mv9: Avo: Direct attachment upload endpoint lacks upload authorization and bypasses field-level upload policy
Description
Avo's direct attachment upload endpoint lacks proper server-side upload authorization, allowing authenticated users to upload or replace attachments on records even when field-level upload policies deny such actions. This affects multi-role Avo Pro/Advanced deployments where per-record or per-field upload restrictions are expected. The vulnerability arises because the upload endpoint creates and attaches files without enforcing the documented upload authorization methods, unlike the deletion endpoint which correctly enforces authorization. This inconsistency enables bypassing intended upload restrictions via direct POST requests to the upload endpoint.
CVSS v3.1
Affected software
Run on your own infrastructure? Check whether these packages are installed with threat-finder — our free open-source scanner.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
The vulnerability in Avo affects the direct attachment upload endpoint (POST /avo_api/resources/:resource_name/:id/attachments/) where the server-side code creates and attaches ActiveStorage blobs before validating attachment associations or enforcing upload authorization policies. The controller does not call the expected authorization methods such as upload_<field>? or update? before attaching files, allowing authenticated users with access to the endpoint to bypass field-level upload policies. This contrasts with the attachment deletion endpoint, which properly enforces delete_<attachment_name>? authorization. The issue impacts versions from 2.28.0 up to but not including 3.32.0, including later beta versions, and has been confirmed by proof-of-concept. The vulnerability is documented in Avo's GitHub issues and pull requests, which clarify that upload authorization should be enforced at the field level but currently is not on this endpoint.
Potential Impact
Authenticated users who can access the vulnerable upload endpoint can upload or replace attachments on records regardless of field-level upload policies or update restrictions. This can lead to unauthorized modification of attachment content, including binary data, filenames, and content-type metadata, potentially violating data integrity and access control expectations in multi-role environments. There is no impact on confidentiality or availability indicated, but integrity is affected.
Mitigation Recommendations
Patch status is not yet confirmed — check the vendor advisory for current remediation guidance. Until an official fix is released, restrict access to the direct attachment upload endpoint to trusted users only and consider implementing additional access controls or request filtering to prevent unauthorized uploads. Monitor Avo's official channels for updates and apply patches promptly once available.
Technical Details
- Gcve Source
- db.gcve.eu
- Osv Id
- GHSA-pqpw-cvm4-8mv9
- Osv Schema Version
- 1.4.0
- Aliases
- ["CVE-2026-53769"]
- Ecosystems
- ["RubyGems"]
- Database Specific Severity
- MODERATE
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
Threat ID: 6a50ba7668715ace435803d3
Added to database: 07/10/2026, 09:25:10 UTC
Last enriched: 07/10/2026, 09:57:08 UTC
Last updated: 07/10/2026, 20:29:12 UTC
Views: 3
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.