Skip to main content
CVE-2026-85103VulnerabilityPublished 09/10/2026

Nationaal Cyber Security Centrum checkpoint · Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Check Point VPN producten

Affects Nationaal Cyber Security Centrum checkpointSource GCVE Database

0

Not known to be exploited.

Data as of 10/25/2026, 16:58:57 UTC

Severity
Critical

Rated by Threat Radar · CVSS not yet scored by NVD

EPSS
4.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 91% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 10 Sep 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

What to do

AI-suggested

The vendor has remediated these vulnerabilities as indicated by the advisory.

Description

Two critical vulnerabilities affecting Check Point VPN products have been addressed by the vendor. The vulnerabilities correspond to CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow) and CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation). No CVSS score is provided, and no known exploits in the wild have been reported. The vendor has released fixes, but specific affected versions and patch details are not provided in the available data.

Impact

The vulnerabilities are classified as critical, indicating a high potential impact if exploited. Heap-based buffer overflow can lead to arbitrary code execution or denial of service, while improper certificate validation can allow man-in-the-middle attacks or unauthorized access. No evidence of active exploitation is reported.

Weaknesses

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…