Netty's HTTP/3 codec (io.netty:netty-codec-http3) versions 4.2.2.Final through 4.2.17.Final builds the HTTP/3 :authority pseudo-header from the… (CVE-2026-100664)
Netty's HTTP/3 codec versions 4.2.2.Final through 4.2.17.Final improperly prioritize the HTTP/1 Host header over the authority in an absolute-form HTTP/1 request-target when building the HTTP/3 :authority pseudo-header. This behavior violates HTTP/1.1 rules and can cause authority confusion in Netty-based HTTP/1-to-HTTP/3 gateways or proxies. Such confusion may lead to incorrect virtual-host routing, allow-list checks, backend selection, cache key usage, and URL generation. The issue impacts data integrity but does not affect code execution or availability. The vulnerability is fixed in version 4.2.18.Final.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The vulnerability in Netty's HTTP/3 codec (io.netty:netty-codec-http3) versions 4.2.2.Final through 4.2.17.Final arises because the HTTP/3 :authority pseudo-header is constructed from the HTTP/1 Host header before considering the authority component of an absolute-form HTTP/1 request-target. According to HTTP/1.1 specifications, when an absolute-form request-target is received, the Host header should be ignored for authority determination. However, Netty's implementation gives precedence to a non-empty Host header, leading to authority confusion. In scenarios such as HTTP/1-to-HTTP/3 gateways or proxies, a remote client can send conflicting authority information (e.g., a request-target with a trusted domain but a Host header with an attacker-controlled domain). This discrepancy can cause components that rely on the authority for routing, authorization, or caching to make inconsistent decisions compared to the upstream HTTP/3 peer. The impact is limited to integrity issues without code execution or availability effects. The issue is resolved in Netty version 4.2.18.Final.
Potential Impact
The vulnerability causes authority confusion between HTTP/1 and HTTP/3 layers in Netty-based gateways or proxies, potentially leading to incorrect virtual-host routing, allow-list checks, backend selection, cache key generation, and URL generation. This can result in integrity violations where requests are misrouted or unauthorized access decisions are made based on conflicting authority information. There is no impact on code execution, memory corruption, or service availability.
Mitigation Recommendations
Upgrade Netty's HTTP/3 codec to version 4.2.18.Final or later where this issue is fixed. No other mitigation is required as the fix addresses the root cause by correctly prioritizing the authority from the absolute-form request-target over the Host header.
Netty's HTTP/3 codec (io.netty:netty-codec-http3) versions 4.2.2.Final through 4.2.17.Final builds the HTTP/3 :authority pseudo-header from the… (CVE-2026-100664)
Description
Netty's HTTP/3 codec versions 4.2.2.Final through 4.2.17.Final improperly prioritize the HTTP/1 Host header over the authority in an absolute-form HTTP/1 request-target when building the HTTP/3 :authority pseudo-header. This behavior violates HTTP/1.1 rules and can cause authority confusion in Netty-based HTTP/1-to-HTTP/3 gateways or proxies. Such confusion may lead to incorrect virtual-host routing, allow-list checks, backend selection, cache key usage, and URL generation. The issue impacts data integrity but does not affect code execution or availability. The vulnerability is fixed in version 4.2.18.Final.
CVSS v3.1
Score 7.5high
Affected software
pkg:maven/io.netty/netty-codec-http3Run on your own infrastructure? Check whether these packages are installed with threat-finder — our free open-source scanner.
Weaknesses
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
The vulnerability in Netty's HTTP/3 codec (io.netty:netty-codec-http3) versions 4.2.2.Final through 4.2.17.Final arises because the HTTP/3 :authority pseudo-header is constructed from the HTTP/1 Host header before considering the authority component of an absolute-form HTTP/1 request-target. According to HTTP/1.1 specifications, when an absolute-form request-target is received, the Host header should be ignored for authority determination. However, Netty's implementation gives precedence to a non-empty Host header, leading to authority confusion. In scenarios such as HTTP/1-to-HTTP/3 gateways or proxies, a remote client can send conflicting authority information (e.g., a request-target with a trusted domain but a Host header with an attacker-controlled domain). This discrepancy can cause components that rely on the authority for routing, authorization, or caching to make inconsistent decisions compared to the upstream HTTP/3 peer. The impact is limited to integrity issues without code execution or availability effects. The issue is resolved in Netty version 4.2.18.Final.
Potential Impact
The vulnerability causes authority confusion between HTTP/1 and HTTP/3 layers in Netty-based gateways or proxies, potentially leading to incorrect virtual-host routing, allow-list checks, backend selection, cache key generation, and URL generation. This can result in integrity violations where requests are misrouted or unauthorized access decisions are made based on conflicting authority information. There is no impact on code execution, memory corruption, or service availability.
Mitigation Recommendations
Upgrade Netty's HTTP/3 codec to version 4.2.18.Final or later where this issue is fixed. No other mitigation is required as the fix addresses the root cause by correctly prioritizing the authority from the absolute-form request-target over the Host header.
Technical Details
- Gcve Source
- db.gcve.eu
- Osv Id
- GHSA-gjrj-m8xc-f2cm
- Osv Schema Version
- 1.4.0
- Aliases
- ["CVE-2026-100664"]
- Database Specific Severity
- HIGH
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
Threat ID: 6ab89be0f7a7c54106942053
Added to database: 09/27/2026, 04:30:24 UTC
Last enriched: 09/27/2026, 04:43:08 UTC
Last updated: 09/28/2026, 01:47:40 UTC
Views: 18
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.