CVE-2025-55154VulnerabilityPublished 7 Sep 2026Updated 16 Sep 2026

SUSE · GraphicsMagick-1.3.48-2.1 on GA media

Affects SUSESource GCVE Database

Not known to be exploited : upgrade to 6.9.10.68-8.el7_9 or 1.3.48-2.1 when convenient.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

Severity

Medium

Rated by Threat Radar · CVSS not yet scored by NVD

EPSS: 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 60% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 6.9.10.68-8.el7_9, 1.3.48-2.1

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 7 Sep 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade SUSE to 6.9.10.68-8.el7_9 or 1.3.48-2.1.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SUSE Product Security Team SUSE	Affected >=1.3.48 <1.3.48-2.1 >=6.9.10.68 <6.9.10.68-8.el7_9	Fixed in 1.3.48-2.1 6.9.10.68-8.el7_9

AI-suggested

Red Hat and SUSE have released updated packages that fix this vulnerability. Users should apply the official security updates for ImageMagick (e.g., ImageMagick-6.9.10.68-8.el7_9 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7) or GraphicsMagick-1.3.48-2.1 on openSUSE Tumbleweed. Refer to the vendor advisories and update instructions at https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258. No additional mitigation is required beyond applying the official patches.

Description

CVE-2025-55154 is an integer overflow vulnerability in ImageMagick affecting MNG magnification. It is addressed in the GraphicsMagick-1.3.48-2.1 package on openSUSE Tumbleweed and related Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support packages. The issue could lead to security risks if exploited. Red Hat has released an important security update fixing this vulnerability in ImageMagick 6.9.10.68-8.el7_9. No known exploits are reported in the wild. The vulnerability is rated medium severity.

CWE-190Integer Overflow or Wraparound (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: Medium
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
Requirements
Ensure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.
Requirements · Language Selection
Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.4.3 (opens in a new tab)
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Forced Integer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 17 Sep 2026, 03:32 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-190

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats